Effectiveness of Community Participation in Wildlife Resources Conservation in Cross River National Park, Nigeria

This study assessed the effectiveness of community participation in the conservation of wildlife resources in Cross River National Park, Akamkpa, Nigeria. Cochran’s sample size formula was used to calculate the number of the park’s communities. Out of 105 communities, eighteen communities within the support zone were purposively selected due to their significance, (proximity and acquaintance) and administrative convenience and used for the study. Total sample size for the study was 1,046, and the sample intensity was 0.022. Primary data was collected through the use of participatory rural appraisal tools namely questionnaires, semi-structural interviews, and focus group discussions. Kruskal–Wali’s test was used to test the significance of the data. The result shows 92% of the respondents were males against 8% females. Majority aged 40-49 years (27%) and 50-59 years (26%) as well as 20-29 years, 30-39 years and 60 years upward were 14%, 19% and 3% respectively. Specifically, 40.4% of the respondents strongly agreed, while 32.2% agreed that they participate in wildlife conservation management. In terms of contribution to the park's management, 40.9% of the respondents strongly agreed, 32.9% agreed that they contribute to the park's management, while 26.2% disagreed. The table shows that majority of Rangers 37% agree that communities around the park contribute to the park management by reducing the rate of trespassing activities in the park, followed by 26% who helped to reduced poaching. It is also indicated in the table that, shares of 21% and 9% said their contributions to park management have also helped in reducing the rate of vandals and grazing respectively. The level of community participation in park management was moderate, with communities contributing to the park’s decision-making processes, providing information, and supporting policy implementation. It is recommended that CRNP should establish a monitoring and evaluation framework to track community participation in park management.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64388/irev9i8-1714225
Primary Topic
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effectiveness of Community Participation in Wildlife Resources Conservation in Cross River National Park, Nigeria

Eric Offiong, Beshel A. URIM, Vincent T. Ebu, Prof. Nchor A. Ayuk et al.
Iconic Research and Engineering Journals
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
article

Effectiveness of Community Participation in Wildlife Resources Conservation in Cross River National Park, Nigeria

Eric Offiong, Beshel A. URIM, Vincent T. Ebu, Prof. Nchor A. Ayuk, Dr. Anoh Regina Ado
article en

Abstract

This study assessed the effectiveness of community participation in the conservation of wildlife resources in Cross River National Park, Akamkpa, Nigeria. Cochran’s sample size formula was used to calculate the number of the park’s communities. Out of 105 communities, eighteen communities within the support zone were purposively selected due to their significance, (proximity and acquaintance) and administrative convenience and used for the study. Total sample size for the study was 1,046, and the sample intensity was 0.022. Primary data was collected through the use of participatory rural appraisal tools namely questionnaires, semi-structural interviews, and focus group discussions. Kruskal–Wali’s test was used to test the significance of the data. The result shows 92% of the respondents were males against 8% females. Majority aged 40-49 years (27%) and 50-59 years (26%) as well as 20-29 years, 30-39 years and 60 years upward were 14%, 19% and 3% respectively. Specifically, 40.4% of the respondents strongly agreed, while 32.2% agreed that they participate in wildlife conservation management. In terms of contribution to the park's management, 40.9% of the respondents strongly agreed, 32.9% agreed that they contribute to the park's management, while 26.2% disagreed. The table shows that majority of Rangers 37% agree that communities around the park contribute to the park management by reducing the rate of trespassing activities in the park, followed by 26% who helped to reduced poaching. It is also indicated in the table that, shares of 21% and 9% said their contributions to park management have also helped in reducing the rate of vandals and grazing respectively. The level of community participation in park management was moderate, with communities contributing to the park’s decision-making processes, providing information, and supporting policy implementation. It is recommended that CRNP should establish a monitoring and evaluation framework to track community participation in park management.

Iconic Research and Engineering JournalsVol. 9(8)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Conservation, Biodiversity, and Resource Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.