The Impact of a Robust Supplemental Screening Program on False-Negative Rates: Time for New Benchmarks?

A robust SS program allows for the symptomatic FNR to fall below published national performance benchmarks from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Most patients with symptomatic IC were at higher-than-average risk and underutilized SS MRI.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Breast Imaging
Published
2025-11-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/jbi/wbaf076
Primary Topic
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Impact of a Robust Supplemental Screening Program on False-Negative Rates: Time for New Benchmarks?

Ashley Huppe, Camron Smith, Allison M. Aripoli, Lauren Clark et al.
Journal of Breast Imaging
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
article

The Impact of a Robust Supplemental Screening Program on False-Negative Rates: Time for New Benchmarks?

Ashley Huppe, Camron Smith, Allison M. Aripoli, Lauren Clark, Onalisa Winblad, Molly Hill, Jessica Peterson, Carissa Walter
article en

Abstract

A robust SS program allows for the symptomatic FNR to fall below published national performance benchmarks from the Breast Cancer Surveillance Consortium. Most patients with symptomatic IC were at higher-than-average risk and underutilized SS MRI.

Journal of Breast Imaging
The University of Kansas Health System (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Global Cancer Incidence and Screening
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.