Unrest Against Bogus Self-Employment? Identity Struggles and Resistance Among Platform Riders in Taiwan

Where unions are weak and governance authoritarian, gig workers rely on everyday resistance rather than organizing. Taiwan is distinctive: both employees and the self-employed can unionize, and riders have formed unions, yet working conditions remain insufficient. Taiwan’s employment relations provide few worker-participation mechanisms, leaving terms of employment largely determined by employer-imposed rules without worker input. Platforms use consent, freedom and fear to make standard employment appear undesirable, limiting solidarity-based demands for re-employment. The employee–self-employed binary thus forces riders to choose between autonomy and protection. Drawing on Taiwan’s experience, labour-law reform should respond to riders’ demands by establishing countervailing mechanisms and participatory rights – information, consultation and codetermination – empowering them to challenge algorithmic control, curb subordination and secure genuine autonomy.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social & Legal Studies
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/09646639261422221
Primary Topic
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Unrest Against Bogus Self-Employment? Identity Struggles and Resistance Among Platform Riders in Taiwan

Yu-Fan Chiu
Social & Legal Studies
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
article

Unrest Against Bogus Self-Employment? Identity Struggles and Resistance Among Platform Riders in Taiwan

Yu-Fan Chiu
article en

Abstract

Where unions are weak and governance authoritarian, gig workers rely on everyday resistance rather than organizing. Taiwan is distinctive: both employees and the self-employed can unionize, and riders have formed unions, yet working conditions remain insufficient. Taiwan’s employment relations provide few worker-participation mechanisms, leaving terms of employment largely determined by employer-imposed rules without worker input. Platforms use consent, freedom and fear to make standard employment appear undesirable, limiting solidarity-based demands for re-employment. The employee–self-employed binary thus forces riders to choose between autonomy and protection. Drawing on Taiwan’s experience, labour-law reform should respond to riders’ demands by establishing countervailing mechanisms and participatory rights – information, consultation and codetermination – empowering them to challenge algorithmic control, curb subordination and secure genuine autonomy.

Social & Legal Studies
National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University (TW)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 57%
Digital Economy and Work Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.