Acetabular cup anteversion measurement in total hip arthroplasty: reliability of metal artifact reduction MRI compared with CT.

Objective The acetabular cup version in patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a key parameter influencing hip stability and functional outcomes. Although CT remains the reference standard for assessing cup orientation, MRI with metal artifact reduction techniques is increasingly used for evaluating postoperative pain. This study compared MRI- and CT-based measurements of acetabular cup version regarding agreement, reproducibility, and reliability.Material And Methods Patients who underwent THA between 2015 and 2025 with postoperative CT and MRI were retrospectively analyzed. MRI was performed using optimized metal artifact reduction sequences. Acetabular cup version was measured on axial high-bandwidth T1-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences and on corresponding CT scans by two musculoskeletal radiologists. Inter- and intra-reader, as well as inter-modality agreement, were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Bland-Altman plots evaluated systematic bias.Results Thirty patients were included (mean age, 64.1 years; 14 women). Mean acetabular version was 31.2° (standard deviation (SD), 9.4-10.3) for CT and 30.1-30.2° (SD, 8.9-9.3) for MRI for both readers. Inter-reader agreement was almost perfect for CT (ICC, 0.96) and substantial for MRI (ICC, 0.76). Intra-reader agreement was almost perfect for both modalities (ICC, CT, 0.99; MRI, 0.94). Bland-Altman analysis showed no statistically significant differences between CT and MRI measurements with a slight positive bias for MRI (mean pooled difference, 1.1°; p = 0.058; limits of agreement, -4.7 to 6.8°) and almost perfect agreement for both readers (ICC, 0.86-0.90).Conclusion MRI measures acetabular cup version with excellent reliability and close agreement with CT, reinforcing MRI's role in postoperative THA evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Published
2026-02-12
DOI
https://doi.org/10.48620/94760
Primary Topic
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acetabular cup anteversion measurement in total hip arthroplasty: reliability of metal artifact reduction MRI compared with CT.

Patrick Oliver Zingg, Frederik Abel, Florian Schmaranzer, Reto Sutter
Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
article

Acetabular cup anteversion measurement in total hip arthroplasty: reliability of metal artifact reduction MRI compared with CT.

Patrick Oliver Zingg, Frederik Abel, Florian Schmaranzer, Reto Sutter
article en

Abstract

Objective The acetabular cup version in patients with total hip arthroplasty (THA) is a key parameter influencing hip stability and functional outcomes. Although CT remains the reference standard for assessing cup orientation, MRI with metal artifact reduction techniques is increasingly used for evaluating postoperative pain. This study compared MRI- and CT-based measurements of acetabular cup version regarding agreement, reproducibility, and reliability.Material And Methods Patients who underwent THA between 2015 and 2025 with postoperative CT and MRI were retrospectively analyzed. MRI was performed using optimized metal artifact reduction sequences. Acetabular cup version was measured on axial high-bandwidth T1-weighted turbo spin-echo sequences and on corresponding CT scans by two musculoskeletal radiologists. Inter- and intra-reader, as well as inter-modality agreement, were assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Bland-Altman plots evaluated systematic bias.Results Thirty patients were included (mean age, 64.1 years; 14 women). Mean acetabular version was 31.2° (standard deviation (SD), 9.4-10.3) for CT and 30.1-30.2° (SD, 8.9-9.3) for MRI for both readers. Inter-reader agreement was almost perfect for CT (ICC, 0.96) and substantial for MRI (ICC, 0.76). Intra-reader agreement was almost perfect for both modalities (ICC, CT, 0.99; MRI, 0.94). Bland-Altman analysis showed no statistically significant differences between CT and MRI measurements with a slight positive bias for MRI (mean pooled difference, 1.1°; p = 0.058; limits of agreement, -4.7 to 6.8°) and almost perfect agreement for both readers (ICC, 0.86-0.90).Conclusion MRI measures acetabular cup version with excellent reliability and close agreement with CT, reinforcing MRI's role in postoperative THA evaluation.

Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern
Society of Interventional Radiology (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Orthopaedic implants and arthroplasty
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Acetabular cup anteversion measurement in total hip arthroplasty: reliability of metal artifact reduction MRI compared with CT. — Patrick Oliver Zingg, Frederik Abel, et al. · Open Access CRIS of the University of Bern (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS