Effects of Expectation, Attention, and NMDA Receptor Blockade on Feedforward and Feedback Processing

Perception is increasingly viewed as an inferential process wherein sensory inputs are integrated with prior expectations. We employed time-resolved decoding on electroencephalography (EEG) data (<i>n</i> = 30 male participants) to investigate how expectations modulate sensory processing across varying levels of stimulus complexity and tested the effect of attention and NMDA receptor blockade. We designed a visual stimulus containing features of different complexity whose processing relies on distinct neural mechanisms: local contrast, collinearity, and the Kanizsa illusion, involving primarily feedforward, lateral, and feedback processes, respectively. EEG decoding revealed that expectations modulated lateral and feedback processing (better decoding for unexpected stimuli) but not feedforward processing. These expectation effects were confined to attended (task-relevant) features and were not observed for task-irrelevant features. The NMDA receptor antagonist memantine selectively enhanced decoding of the Kanizsa illusion, implicating NMDA-mediated feedback mechanisms in perceptual inference, but it did not modulate the effects of expectation or attention. These findings highlight the differential impact of expectations across different stages of sensory processing and reveal a distinct role of NMDA receptor-mediated feedback mechanisms.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Neuroscience
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1523/jneurosci.0674-25.2026
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of Expectation, Attention, and NMDA Receptor Blockade on Feedforward and Feedback Processing

Johannes J. Fahrenfort, Micha Heilbron, Jasper B. Zantvoord, Claire Sergent et al.
Journal of Neuroscience
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Effects of Expectation, Attention, and NMDA Receptor Blockade on Feedforward and Feedback Processing

Johannes J. Fahrenfort, Micha Heilbron, Jasper B. Zantvoord, Claire Sergent, Samuel Noorman, Simon van Gaal, Timo Stein
article en

Abstract

Perception is increasingly viewed as an inferential process wherein sensory inputs are integrated with prior expectations. We employed time-resolved decoding on electroencephalography (EEG) data (<i>n</i> = 30 male participants) to investigate how expectations modulate sensory processing across varying levels of stimulus complexity and tested the effect of attention and NMDA receptor blockade. We designed a visual stimulus containing features of different complexity whose processing relies on distinct neural mechanisms: local contrast, collinearity, and the Kanizsa illusion, involving primarily feedforward, lateral, and feedback processes, respectively. EEG decoding revealed that expectations modulated lateral and feedback processing (better decoding for unexpected stimuli) but not feedforward processing. These expectation effects were confined to attended (task-relevant) features and were not observed for task-irrelevant features. The NMDA receptor antagonist memantine selectively enhanced decoding of the Kanizsa illusion, implicating NMDA-mediated feedback mechanisms in perceptual inference, but it did not modulate the effects of expectation or attention. These findings highlight the differential impact of expectations across different stages of sensory processing and reveal a distinct role of NMDA receptor-mediated feedback mechanisms.

Journal of NeuroscienceVol. 46(12)
Université Paris Cité (FR), Institut de Neurosciences Cognitives et Intégratives d’Aquitaine (FR), Amsterdam Neuroscience (NL), Amsterdam University Medical Centers (NL), Amsterdam University of Applied Sciences (NL), Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam (NL), University of Amsterdam (NL)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.