Reliability and physical performance predictors of a military casualty emergency evacuation test

This study investigated the reliability of a novel casualty emergency evacuation (CEE) test and its associations with physical performance variables. Forty-eight male reservists performed the CEE test, along with physical performance and body composition assessments. The reliability of the CEE was evaluated across two sessions, using analyses of typical error, intraclass correlation (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV). Pearson's correlation and multiple linear regression (MLR) were applied to identify variables associated with the CEE. The ICC (0.84) and CV (6.77%) indicated that the CEE test demonstrated good reliability. The strongest correlations were observed between the CEE and standing long jump (<i>r</i> = -0.67, <i>p</i> < 0.001), 30 m sprint (<i>r</i> = 0.59, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and countermovement jump (<i>r</i> = -0.55, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In the multiple regression analysis, body height, 60 s push-ups, standing long jump, and 30 s jumps collectively explained 67% of the variance in CEE time.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ergonomics
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2026.2630002
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability and physical performance predictors of a military casualty emergency evacuation test

Heikki Kyröläinen, Kai Pihlainen, Tommi Ojanen, Jani P. Vaara et al.
Ergonomics
Occupational Health and Performance
article

Reliability and physical performance predictors of a military casualty emergency evacuation test

Heikki Kyröläinen, Kai Pihlainen, Tommi Ojanen, Jani P. Vaara, Jussi Mussalo, Tomi Vänttinen, Anssi Saari
article en

Abstract

This study investigated the reliability of a novel casualty emergency evacuation (CEE) test and its associations with physical performance variables. Forty-eight male reservists performed the CEE test, along with physical performance and body composition assessments. The reliability of the CEE was evaluated across two sessions, using analyses of typical error, intraclass correlation (ICC) and coefficient of variation (CV). Pearson's correlation and multiple linear regression (MLR) were applied to identify variables associated with the CEE. The ICC (0.84) and CV (6.77%) indicated that the CEE test demonstrated good reliability. The strongest correlations were observed between the CEE and standing long jump (<i>r</i> = -0.67, <i>p</i> < 0.001), 30 m sprint (<i>r</i> = 0.59, <i>p</i> < 0.001) and countermovement jump (<i>r</i> = -0.55, <i>p</i> < 0.001). In the multiple regression analysis, body height, 60 s push-ups, standing long jump, and 30 s jumps collectively explained 67% of the variance in CEE time.

Ergonomics
English Institute of Sport (GB), Finnish Defence Forces (FI), Puolustusvoimien tutkimuslaitos, National Defence University (PK), University of Jyväskylä (FI)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Occupational Health and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.