Hip joint contact forces and muscle contributions between bounce and standard squats

Bounce squats, involving a rapid eccentric-concentric transition, are used in strength training to enhance force production via the stretch-shortening cycle. However, its effects on hip joint contact force (JCF) and muscle-specific contributions remain unclear. This study investigated the hip JCF and individual muscle contributions during bounce and standard squats. Nine healthy resistance-trained participants (7 males, 2 females; ≥3 years of resistance training experience) performed four trials each of bounce and standard squats across five loads (0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of body weight). Three-dimensional motion capture, force plates, and electromyography data were used to estimate hip JCF and muscle contributions via musculoskeletal modeling and simulation. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare hip JCF and muscle contributions between squat types and load conditions. Peak hip flexion angles (F(4, 32) = 3.58, p < 0.015, η2p = 0.31) and peak hip net joint moments (F (4, 32) = 3.44, p < 0.018, η2p = 0.30) were significantly greater in bounce than standard squats across loads. Peak hip JCF was also greater in bounce squats (F(1, 8) = 44.97, p < 0.001, η2p = 0.84). This increase was attributed to greater hamstrings (F(1, 8) = 23.98, p = 0.001, η2p = 0.75) and gluteus maximus (F(1, 8) = 13.40, p = 0.006, η2p = 0.63) contributions. Bounce squats increase hip JCF compared with standard squats, primarily due to greater hamstrings and gluteus maximus contributions. While the bounce strategy may offer performance benefits, the associated increase in mechanical hip joint loading may represent a potential risk factor that warrants consideration during resistance training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13102-026-01603-1
Primary Topic
Sports injuries and prevention
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Hip joint contact forces and muscle contributions between bounce and standard squats

Silvio Lorenzetti, Basil Achermann, Taewoong Kong, Gyeongeun Lee
BMC Sports Science Medicine and Rehabilitation
Sports injuries and prevention
article

Hip joint contact forces and muscle contributions between bounce and standard squats

Silvio Lorenzetti, Basil Achermann, Taewoong Kong, Gyeongeun Lee
article en

Abstract

Bounce squats, involving a rapid eccentric-concentric transition, are used in strength training to enhance force production via the stretch-shortening cycle. However, its effects on hip joint contact force (JCF) and muscle-specific contributions remain unclear. This study investigated the hip JCF and individual muscle contributions during bounce and standard squats. Nine healthy resistance-trained participants (7 males, 2 females; ≥3 years of resistance training experience) performed four trials each of bounce and standard squats across five loads (0%, 25%, 50%, 75%, and 100% of body weight). Three-dimensional motion capture, force plates, and electromyography data were used to estimate hip JCF and muscle contributions via musculoskeletal modeling and simulation. Two-way repeated-measures analysis of variance was used to compare hip JCF and muscle contributions between squat types and load conditions. Peak hip flexion angles (F(4, 32) = 3.58, p < 0.015, η2p = 0.31) and peak hip net joint moments (F (4, 32) = 3.44, p < 0.018, η2p = 0.30) were significantly greater in bounce than standard squats across loads. Peak hip JCF was also greater in bounce squats (F(1, 8) = 44.97, p < 0.001, η2p = 0.84). This increase was attributed to greater hamstrings (F(1, 8) = 23.98, p = 0.001, η2p = 0.75) and gluteus maximus (F(1, 8) = 13.40, p = 0.006, η2p = 0.63) contributions. Bounce squats increase hip JCF compared with standard squats, primarily due to greater hamstrings and gluteus maximus contributions. While the bounce strategy may offer performance benefits, the associated increase in mechanical hip joint loading may represent a potential risk factor that warrants consideration during resistance training.

BMC Sports Science Medicine and RehabilitationVol. 18(1)
ZHAW Zurich University of Applied Sciences (CH), Soonchunhyang University (KR), ETH Zurich (CH), Institute for Biomedical Engineering (CH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Sports injuries and prevention
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.