Quantifying Snow–Ground Backscatter Uncertainty: A Bayesian Approach Using Multifrequency SAR and In-Situ Observations

Accurate estimation of snowpack microwave backscatter is critical for retrieving key physical properties of snow, such as snow depth (SD) and snow water equivalent (SWE), typically modeled using radiative transfer models (RTM). Among the various sources of uncertainty in RTM simulations, snow–ground reflectivity—used as a boundary condition—plays a critical role in influencing the accuracy of simulated backscatter. This study leverages high-resolution X- and Ku-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) backscatter aircraft measurements using SWESARR and SnowSAR from NASA’s SnowEx campaigns, co-located with in situ snow pit observations in Grand Mesa, Colorado, and uses a Bayesian MCMC parameter optimization model with RTM framework to estimate the key ground parameters such as surface roughness, moisture content, and specular-to-total reflectivity ratio (STRR) governing the estimation of the snow–ground reflectivity and quantify the uncertainties associated with them. At the X-band, increasing ground surface roughness reduced the simulated backscatter by ~1.5 dB across the tested range, increasing the STRR produced an additional ~1.0 dB decrease while the dielectric properties of the ground are highly sensitive to the moisture content of frozen soil, and increasing the moisture content even by 2% increased the backscatter by 2–3 dB. The retrieval sensitivity to the STRR is minimized in the 0.6–0.7 range and it can be fixed at 0.65 without having discernible impact. The Bayesian inversion reveals that the extreme parameter values act as diagnostic indicators of unmodeled complexity rather than retrieval failures, with representativeness error often dominating over instrument noise. The study provides a robust methodology for the estimation of the snow–ground backscatter boundary condition for forward modeling, ultimately aiding SWE and SD retrieval from active microwave observations. While this study relied on Grand Mesa, the framework developed here is general and, along with the model uncertainty, is directly transferable and broadly applicable to other snow-dominated mountain regions where active microwave observations can be used for snowpack monitoring.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs18040634
Primary Topic
Cryospheric studies and observations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying Snow–Ground Backscatter Uncertainty: A Bayesian Approach Using Multifrequency SAR and In-Situ Observations

Ashwani Rai, Ana P. Barros
Remote Sensing
Cryospheric studies and observations
article

Quantifying Snow–Ground Backscatter Uncertainty: A Bayesian Approach Using Multifrequency SAR and In-Situ Observations

Ashwani Rai, Ana P. Barros
article en

Abstract

Accurate estimation of snowpack microwave backscatter is critical for retrieving key physical properties of snow, such as snow depth (SD) and snow water equivalent (SWE), typically modeled using radiative transfer models (RTM). Among the various sources of uncertainty in RTM simulations, snow–ground reflectivity—used as a boundary condition—plays a critical role in influencing the accuracy of simulated backscatter. This study leverages high-resolution X- and Ku-band synthetic aperture radar (SAR) backscatter aircraft measurements using SWESARR and SnowSAR from NASA’s SnowEx campaigns, co-located with in situ snow pit observations in Grand Mesa, Colorado, and uses a Bayesian MCMC parameter optimization model with RTM framework to estimate the key ground parameters such as surface roughness, moisture content, and specular-to-total reflectivity ratio (STRR) governing the estimation of the snow–ground reflectivity and quantify the uncertainties associated with them. At the X-band, increasing ground surface roughness reduced the simulated backscatter by ~1.5 dB across the tested range, increasing the STRR produced an additional ~1.0 dB decrease while the dielectric properties of the ground are highly sensitive to the moisture content of frozen soil, and increasing the moisture content even by 2% increased the backscatter by 2–3 dB. The retrieval sensitivity to the STRR is minimized in the 0.6–0.7 range and it can be fixed at 0.65 without having discernible impact. The Bayesian inversion reveals that the extreme parameter values act as diagnostic indicators of unmodeled complexity rather than retrieval failures, with representativeness error often dominating over instrument noise. The study provides a robust methodology for the estimation of the snow–ground backscatter boundary condition for forward modeling, ultimately aiding SWE and SD retrieval from active microwave observations. While this study relied on Grand Mesa, the framework developed here is general and, along with the model uncertainty, is directly transferable and broadly applicable to other snow-dominated mountain regions where active microwave observations can be used for snowpack monitoring.

Remote SensingVol. 18(4)
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 64%
Cryospheric studies and observations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantifying Snow–Ground Backscatter Uncertainty: A Bayesian Approach Using Multifrequency SAR and In-Situ Observations — Ashwani Rai, Ana P. Barros · Remote Sensing (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS