Biological Foundation Models Enable CRISPR Array Detection Without Metagenomic Assembly

Abstract Accurate identification of CRISPR arrays is essential for studying prokaryotic adaptive immunity, yet existing tools struggle with short-read sequencing data and arrays containing degenerate repeats. These limitations restrict CRISPR analysis in metagenomic and fragmented genomic datasets. We present a foundation model-based approach for CRISPR array detection that addresses both these challenges. We fine-tune a large genomic foundation model using the Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) method, Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) to perform per-nucleotide classification of DNA sequences into repeat, spacer, and non-array regions directly from raw input nucleotide sequences. We develop two model variants for different sequence context lengths. The long-context model supporting sequences of up to 8,192 nucleotides achieves 98.16% test accuracy and identifies degenerate repeat candidates missed by similarity-based CRISPR detection tools. The short-context model supports sequences of up to 150 nucleotides, optimized for Illumina reads, reaches 90.03% accuracy and enables direct analysis of individual reads without assembly. On simulated metagenomic data, it achieves a spacer recall of 49.12% and recovers 12.57% of spacers that are otherwise not detected by dedicated metagenomic CRISPR array detection methods which require metagenomic assembly. Together, these results demonstrate that genomic foundation models provide a robust and complementary paradigm for CRISPR array detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.02.16.706169
Primary Topic
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Biological Foundation Models Enable CRISPR Array Detection Without Metagenomic Assembly

Ryan Koeksal, Alexander Mitrofanov, Rolf Backofen, M Uhl et al.
bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
article

Biological Foundation Models Enable CRISPR Array Detection Without Metagenomic Assembly

Ryan Koeksal, Alexander Mitrofanov, Rolf Backofen, M Uhl, Lukas Daugaard Schroeder
article en

Abstract

Abstract Accurate identification of CRISPR arrays is essential for studying prokaryotic adaptive immunity, yet existing tools struggle with short-read sequencing data and arrays containing degenerate repeats. These limitations restrict CRISPR analysis in metagenomic and fragmented genomic datasets. We present a foundation model-based approach for CRISPR array detection that addresses both these challenges. We fine-tune a large genomic foundation model using the Parameter-Efficient Fine-Tuning (PEFT) method, Low-Rank Adaptation (LoRA) to perform per-nucleotide classification of DNA sequences into repeat, spacer, and non-array regions directly from raw input nucleotide sequences. We develop two model variants for different sequence context lengths. The long-context model supporting sequences of up to 8,192 nucleotides achieves 98.16% test accuracy and identifies degenerate repeat candidates missed by similarity-based CRISPR detection tools. The short-context model supports sequences of up to 150 nucleotides, optimized for Illumina reads, reaches 90.03% accuracy and enables direct analysis of individual reads without assembly. On simulated metagenomic data, it achieves a spacer recall of 49.12% and recovers 12.57% of spacers that are otherwise not detected by dedicated metagenomic CRISPR array detection methods which require metagenomic assembly. Together, these results demonstrate that genomic foundation models provide a robust and complementary paradigm for CRISPR array detection.

bioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)
University of Freiburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.