Validating a low‐cost alternative to body surface area estimation: Implications for energy budgets and scaling relationships of ectotherms

Abstract The surface area of organisms is a key parameter in ecological and evolutionary applications. For example, surface area‐dependent traits such as rates of cutaneous water loss and of heat absorbed are relevant for predicting animal desiccation rates and body temperatures. Therefore, a general lack of surface area data and inaccurate scaling relationships can influence predictions of species' sensitivity to environmental change. In this study, we evaluate a portable, low‐cost, three‐dimensional (3D) structured light scanning approach to provide robust estimations of surface area of several lizard groups using museum specimens (20 species, 7 families). We validated this approach by comparing the surface areas of specimens to those obtained from 3D and micro‐computed tomography (μCT) scans of live individuals. The scaling of surface area obtained from 3D scans of museum specimens and live lizards was equivalent, supporting the usage of museum specimens. For a given body size, the surface area of live lizards from μCT scans was higher than those obtained from 3D structured light scans, likely due to the enhanced resolution of the former approach, but the scaling exponents did not differ. The scaling of surface area followed isometry for all species, except for three hypo‐allometric species relationships. The intercepts and scaling slopes of surface area differed more across than within families. A simulation using a widely employed surface area scaling based on geometric similarity (surface area = 10 Mass 2/3 ) yielded significantly different surface area estimates compared to those obtained from empirically based scaling relationships, influencing overall heat loads of lizards. This pattern was particularly acute with increased body size and higher direct solar radiation. Our results emphasize the need to obtain more robust surface area scaling relationships across lizard species and families, but also other taxonomic groups given the general paucity of these data. Our study demonstrates that 3D structured light scans of museum specimens are a practical, reliable and high throughput technique to achieve this objective, and we provide the methods and workflow to accomplish this task.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.70268
Primary Topic
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Validating a low‐cost alternative to body surface area estimation: Implications for energy budgets and scaling relationships of ectotherms

Susana Clusella‐trullas, Jody Thorburn, Gerhard Wiese
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
article

Validating a low‐cost alternative to body surface area estimation: Implications for energy budgets and scaling relationships of ectotherms

Susana Clusella‐trullas, Jody Thorburn, Gerhard Wiese
article en

Abstract

Abstract The surface area of organisms is a key parameter in ecological and evolutionary applications. For example, surface area‐dependent traits such as rates of cutaneous water loss and of heat absorbed are relevant for predicting animal desiccation rates and body temperatures. Therefore, a general lack of surface area data and inaccurate scaling relationships can influence predictions of species' sensitivity to environmental change. In this study, we evaluate a portable, low‐cost, three‐dimensional (3D) structured light scanning approach to provide robust estimations of surface area of several lizard groups using museum specimens (20 species, 7 families). We validated this approach by comparing the surface areas of specimens to those obtained from 3D and micro‐computed tomography (μCT) scans of live individuals. The scaling of surface area obtained from 3D scans of museum specimens and live lizards was equivalent, supporting the usage of museum specimens. For a given body size, the surface area of live lizards from μCT scans was higher than those obtained from 3D structured light scans, likely due to the enhanced resolution of the former approach, but the scaling exponents did not differ. The scaling of surface area followed isometry for all species, except for three hypo‐allometric species relationships. The intercepts and scaling slopes of surface area differed more across than within families. A simulation using a widely employed surface area scaling based on geometric similarity (surface area = 10 Mass 2/3 ) yielded significantly different surface area estimates compared to those obtained from empirically based scaling relationships, influencing overall heat loads of lizards. This pattern was particularly acute with increased body size and higher direct solar radiation. Our results emphasize the need to obtain more robust surface area scaling relationships across lizard species and families, but also other taxonomic groups given the general paucity of these data. Our study demonstrates that 3D structured light scans of museum specimens are a practical, reliable and high throughput technique to achieve this objective, and we provide the methods and workflow to accomplish this task.

Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Stellenbosch University (ZA)
Affordable and clean energy
Openalex Percentile: Top 65%
Amphibian and Reptile Biology
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.