Feasibility, usability, and acceptability of the asynchronous trauma-focused CARE training program for healthcare providers: a cross-sectional study

Abstract Background The long-term effects of adverse childhood experiences, including various forms of abuse, neglect, and trauma, are well-documented but often inadequately addressed in healthcare settings. Healthcare providers frequently lack the training necessary to provide trauma-focused, evidence-based interventions. To address this gap, we developed the ‘Community Access to Resourced & Resilient PsychoEducation’ (CARE) training program, a scalable, asynchronous, virtual learning platform designed to equip healthcare providers with the skills and knowledge to facilitate an 8-week trauma-focused psychoeducational group intervention for adults with a history of childhood interpersonal trauma. Methods In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated the feasibility, usability, and acceptability of the CARE training program among 62 healthcare providers from six organizations across Ontario. Pre- and post-training questionnaires were used to assess these domains using a combination of Likert-scale items and open-ended questions. Results Sixty-two healthcare providers from six Ontario organizations enrolled in the CARE training program; 42% had worked in the healthcare field for 11 or more years, and nearly all (96.8%) had prior experience with e-learning. 73% completed at least half of the modules and 65% completed ≥ 90%. Most participants reported completing all eight modules within 5–10 h. Among the 34 providers who completed the post-training survey, 97% agreed that the time required was well matched to the knowledge gained, and 97% reported that the multimedia format enhanced their learning experience. Almost all respondents described the modules as clear, practical, and easy to navigate, and most said they would recommend the training to colleagues. The most commonly reported barrier was finding time to complete the modules, while content on emotion regulation and trauma-related interpersonal patterns was highlighted as particularly useful. Conclusions Our findings underscore the feasibility, usability, and acceptability of a virtual, asynchronous trauma-focused psychoeducational training program for healthcare providers. The CARE program’s multimedia, self-paced format was well received and offers a scalable approach to trauma-focused training across diverse healthcare settings. Future phases of this study will evaluate training-related knowledge and confidence and examine effectiveness and implementation outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Medical Education
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-026-08794-8
Primary Topic
Child Abuse and Trauma
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feasibility, usability, and acceptability of the asynchronous trauma-focused CARE training program for healthcare providers: a cross-sectional study

Dana Ross, Nancy McCallum, David Rojas, Sophie Soklaridis et al.
BMC Medical Education
Child Abuse and Trauma
article

Feasibility, usability, and acceptability of the asynchronous trauma-focused CARE training program for healthcare providers: a cross-sectional study

Dana Ross, Nancy McCallum, David Rojas, Sophie Soklaridis, Aysha Butt, E E Wang, Annie K. Truuvert, S Vigod
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background The long-term effects of adverse childhood experiences, including various forms of abuse, neglect, and trauma, are well-documented but often inadequately addressed in healthcare settings. Healthcare providers frequently lack the training necessary to provide trauma-focused, evidence-based interventions. To address this gap, we developed the ‘Community Access to Resourced & Resilient PsychoEducation’ (CARE) training program, a scalable, asynchronous, virtual learning platform designed to equip healthcare providers with the skills and knowledge to facilitate an 8-week trauma-focused psychoeducational group intervention for adults with a history of childhood interpersonal trauma. Methods In this cross-sectional study, we evaluated the feasibility, usability, and acceptability of the CARE training program among 62 healthcare providers from six organizations across Ontario. Pre- and post-training questionnaires were used to assess these domains using a combination of Likert-scale items and open-ended questions. Results Sixty-two healthcare providers from six Ontario organizations enrolled in the CARE training program; 42% had worked in the healthcare field for 11 or more years, and nearly all (96.8%) had prior experience with e-learning. 73% completed at least half of the modules and 65% completed ≥ 90%. Most participants reported completing all eight modules within 5–10 h. Among the 34 providers who completed the post-training survey, 97% agreed that the time required was well matched to the knowledge gained, and 97% reported that the multimedia format enhanced their learning experience. Almost all respondents described the modules as clear, practical, and easy to navigate, and most said they would recommend the training to colleagues. The most commonly reported barrier was finding time to complete the modules, while content on emotion regulation and trauma-related interpersonal patterns was highlighted as particularly useful. Conclusions Our findings underscore the feasibility, usability, and acceptability of a virtual, asynchronous trauma-focused psychoeducational training program for healthcare providers. The CARE program’s multimedia, self-paced format was well received and offers a scalable approach to trauma-focused training across diverse healthcare settings. Future phases of this study will evaluate training-related knowledge and confidence and examine effectiveness and implementation outcomes.

BMC Medical EducationVol. 26(1)
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (CA), University of Toronto (CA), Women's College Hospital (CA), The Wilson Centre (CA), McMaster University (CA)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Child Abuse and Trauma
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.