Comparative study of cultural heritage sustainability: A bibliometric analysis

To address the gap in systematic bibliometric analysis and review of sustainable development in cultural heritage, this study first outlines the origins of the sustainability discourse and the research context within the cultural heritage field. Building upon quantitative and visual outputs from Web of Science (WOS) and CNKI bibliometric analyses, it examines the evolutionary trajectory of research trends. Subsequently, by comparing high-impact and representative literature, it examines key characteristics in content, theory, methodology and cultural context. Through identifying limitations and future research directions, this study aims to advance the long-term development of cultural heritage sustainability research, fostering synergistic progress in both theoretical exploration and practical application.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102585
Primary Topic
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative study of cultural heritage sustainability: A bibliometric analysis

Linjie Feng, S Lin
Social Sciences & Humanities Open
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
article

Comparative study of cultural heritage sustainability: A bibliometric analysis

Linjie Feng, S Lin
article en

Abstract

To address the gap in systematic bibliometric analysis and review of sustainable development in cultural heritage, this study first outlines the origins of the sustainability discourse and the research context within the cultural heritage field. Building upon quantitative and visual outputs from Web of Science (WOS) and CNKI bibliometric analyses, it examines the evolutionary trajectory of research trends. Subsequently, by comparing high-impact and representative literature, it examines key characteristics in content, theory, methodology and cultural context. Through identifying limitations and future research directions, this study aims to advance the long-term development of cultural heritage sustainability research, fostering synergistic progress in both theoretical exploration and practical application.

Social Sciences & Humanities OpenVol. 13
Macao Polytechnic University (MO), Fuzhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Cultural Heritage Management and Preservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Comparative study of cultural heritage sustainability: A bibliometric analysis — Linjie Feng, S Lin · Social Sciences & Humanities Open (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS