Quantifying roadless areas and fragmentation in the context of wildlife-vehicle collision risk in Great Britain

Roads cause indirect and direct effects for wildlife, including pollution, behavioural changes, wildlife mortality and habitat fragmentation. The ecological impacts of roads extend beyond their immediate vicinity, into 'road effect zones'. Beyond road effect zones, 'roadless areas' can offer refuges from the ecological effects of roads. In this study, we quantify the number and distribution of roadless patches in Great Britain, their ecological status and their overlap with protected areas. Road effect zones applied 100, 500 and 1,000 m on either side of the road network revealed a highly fragmented landscape with 93,561, 29,164 and 6,138 roadless patches, covering 76.6%, 36.0% and 20.6% of terrestrial land, respectively. Roadless areas were smallest, on average, in England and largest in Scotland. For all road effect zones, more than 70% of patches were smaller than 1 km<sup>2</sup>. For the most commonly used road effect zone (1 km), more than 60% of roadless patches were smaller than the mean home range of common UK species, European badger Meles meles and red fox Vulpes vulpes, meaning they likely face a high risk of wildlife-vehicle collisions. Nearly half (47%) of roadless areas coincided with protected land and there was a weak but significant negative relationship between roadless patch size and ecological status. In conclusion, the landscape is fragmented into numerous, small roadless patches. We present roadless areas and their ecological features as an open access searchable map, constituting a tool for conservation practitioners and an important starting point for defragmentation campaigns.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Scientific Reports
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-026-36410-8
Primary Topic
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantifying roadless areas and fragmentation in the context of wildlife-vehicle collision risk in Great Britain

Sarah E. Perkins, Elizabeth A. Chadwick, Sarah Raymond
Scientific Reports
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
article

Quantifying roadless areas and fragmentation in the context of wildlife-vehicle collision risk in Great Britain

Sarah E. Perkins, Elizabeth A. Chadwick, Sarah Raymond
article en

Abstract

Roads cause indirect and direct effects for wildlife, including pollution, behavioural changes, wildlife mortality and habitat fragmentation. The ecological impacts of roads extend beyond their immediate vicinity, into 'road effect zones'. Beyond road effect zones, 'roadless areas' can offer refuges from the ecological effects of roads. In this study, we quantify the number and distribution of roadless patches in Great Britain, their ecological status and their overlap with protected areas. Road effect zones applied 100, 500 and 1,000 m on either side of the road network revealed a highly fragmented landscape with 93,561, 29,164 and 6,138 roadless patches, covering 76.6%, 36.0% and 20.6% of terrestrial land, respectively. Roadless areas were smallest, on average, in England and largest in Scotland. For all road effect zones, more than 70% of patches were smaller than 1 km<sup>2</sup>. For the most commonly used road effect zone (1 km), more than 60% of roadless patches were smaller than the mean home range of common UK species, European badger Meles meles and red fox Vulpes vulpes, meaning they likely face a high risk of wildlife-vehicle collisions. Nearly half (47%) of roadless areas coincided with protected land and there was a weak but significant negative relationship between roadless patch size and ecological status. In conclusion, the landscape is fragmented into numerous, small roadless patches. We present roadless areas and their ecological features as an open access searchable map, constituting a tool for conservation practitioners and an important starting point for defragmentation campaigns.

Scientific ReportsVol. 16(1)
Cardiff University (GB)
UK Research and Innovation
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Wildlife-Road Interactions and Conservation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantifying roadless areas and fragmentation in the context of wildlife-vehicle collision risk in Great Britain — Sarah E. Perkins, Elizabeth A. Chadwick, et al. · Scientific Reports (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS