Artificial Intelligence in Rhinoplasty Recovery: Linguistic Intelligence and Machine Learning-Driven Insights

<b>Objective:</b> This observational, cross-sectional simulation study evaluated ChatGPT-4 as a postoperative information tool for rhinoplasty using standardized questions and blinded ENT specialist ratings. <b>Study Design:</b> This study is an observational, cross-sectional simulation study using blinded expert evaluation. <b>Setting:</b> We used an online Artificial Intelligence (AI) platform accessed under standardized conditions. <b>Methods:</b> Ten typical recovery questions were posed to ChatGPT-4, and the responses were independently rated by ENT specialists for accuracy, clarity, relevance, response time, and patient-centered communication. Responses were also assessed with a structured performance instrument and supported by linguistic and statistical analyses. <b>Results:</b> ChatGPT-4 achieved high scores for accuracy (90%, 95% CI: 84.9-95.1) and clarity (87%, 95% CI: 82.8-91.2), but lower performance in patient-centered communication (77%, 95% CI: 74.0-80.0). Specialist scoring confirmed structured medical reasoning, while machine learning analyses highlighted clarity, diagnostic depth, and empathy as key contributors to higher ratings. <b>Conclusions</b>: ChatGPT-4 demonstrated high clinician-rated accuracy and clarity when answering standardized postoperative rhinoplasty questions, while patient-centered communication remained comparatively lower. These findings suggest that LLM-based tools may complement clinician-delivered postoperative counseling under appropriate oversight, but they are not a substitute for individualized medical advice or surgical follow-up.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm15041590
Primary Topic
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Artificial Intelligence in Rhinoplasty Recovery: Linguistic Intelligence and Machine Learning-Driven Insights

Togay Müderris, Ramil Hashimli, Aynur Aliyeva, Sevinç Hepkarşı et al.
Journal of Clinical Medicine
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
article

Artificial Intelligence in Rhinoplasty Recovery: Linguistic Intelligence and Machine Learning-Driven Insights

Togay Müderris, Ramil Hashimli, Aynur Aliyeva, Sevinç Hepkarşı, Selim S. Erbek, Vusala Snyder, Abdullah Dalğıç, Elad Azizli, Antiga Muradova, Natig Ahmadov
article en

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> This observational, cross-sectional simulation study evaluated ChatGPT-4 as a postoperative information tool for rhinoplasty using standardized questions and blinded ENT specialist ratings. <b>Study Design:</b> This study is an observational, cross-sectional simulation study using blinded expert evaluation. <b>Setting:</b> We used an online Artificial Intelligence (AI) platform accessed under standardized conditions. <b>Methods:</b> Ten typical recovery questions were posed to ChatGPT-4, and the responses were independently rated by ENT specialists for accuracy, clarity, relevance, response time, and patient-centered communication. Responses were also assessed with a structured performance instrument and supported by linguistic and statistical analyses. <b>Results:</b> ChatGPT-4 achieved high scores for accuracy (90%, 95% CI: 84.9-95.1) and clarity (87%, 95% CI: 82.8-91.2), but lower performance in patient-centered communication (77%, 95% CI: 74.0-80.0). Specialist scoring confirmed structured medical reasoning, while machine learning analyses highlighted clarity, diagnostic depth, and empathy as key contributors to higher ratings. <b>Conclusions</b>: ChatGPT-4 demonstrated high clinician-rated accuracy and clarity when answering standardized postoperative rhinoplasty questions, while patient-centered communication remained comparatively lower. These findings suggest that LLM-based tools may complement clinician-delivered postoperative counseling under appropriate oversight, but they are not a substitute for individualized medical advice or surgical follow-up.

Journal of Clinical MedicineVol. 15(4)
Yeditepe University (TR), Izmir University (TR), Ankara University (TR), Medical University of South Carolina (US), Azerbaijan Medical University (AZ), Denver Health Medical Center (US), Artsakh State University (AZ), Turkish Society of Hematology (TR), Denver Public Health (US), Psychiatric Association of Turkey (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Izmir Bozyaka Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi (TR), University of Colorado Denver (US)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 53%
Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.