Robotic-Assisted Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy – A Systematic Review

The anticipated surgical and postoperative outcomes following robotic-assisted single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (R-SADI-S) are not well described in the surgical literature. To perform a systematic review to evaluate clinical and surgical outcomes in patients who have undergone R-SADI-S. A systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Basic descriptive statistics were performed using SPSS v26.0. Overall, 4 studies including data from 160 patients were included. The mean age at the time of surgery was 38.1 years and 55.6% of patients were female (89/160). The mean reported preoperative weight was 122.2 kg and mean body mass index was 45.1 kg/m2. The mean time taken for R-SADI-S was 181 min and 7.5% of patients experienced postoperative complications (12/160), however, just 1.4% of patients required either reintervention and readmission (2/144) respectively. At 24-months follow-up, patients who had undergone-R-SADI-S experienced an average weight loss of 60.7 kg, a BMI change of -18.0 kg/m2, a total body weight loss of 44.6% and excess weight loss of 113.7%. R-SADI-S is a seemingly safe procedure which provides excellent weight loss results when performed for patients living with severe obesity. Given R-SADI-S is a novel technique, these results require further ratification once the learning curve is navigated in prospective analyses to ensure the optimisation of patient outcomes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Obesity Surgery
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11695-026-08540-5
Primary Topic
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Robotic-Assisted Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy – A Systematic Review

Noel E. Donlon, William B. Robb, Matthew G. Davey
Obesity Surgery
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
article

Robotic-Assisted Single Anastomosis Duodeno-Ileal Bypass with Sleeve Gastrectomy – A Systematic Review

Noel E. Donlon, William B. Robb, Matthew G. Davey
article en

Abstract

The anticipated surgical and postoperative outcomes following robotic-assisted single anastomosis duodeno-ileal bypass with sleeve gastrectomy (R-SADI-S) are not well described in the surgical literature. To perform a systematic review to evaluate clinical and surgical outcomes in patients who have undergone R-SADI-S. A systematic review was performed in accordance with the PRISMA guidelines. Basic descriptive statistics were performed using SPSS v26.0. Overall, 4 studies including data from 160 patients were included. The mean age at the time of surgery was 38.1 years and 55.6% of patients were female (89/160). The mean reported preoperative weight was 122.2 kg and mean body mass index was 45.1 kg/m2. The mean time taken for R-SADI-S was 181 min and 7.5% of patients experienced postoperative complications (12/160), however, just 1.4% of patients required either reintervention and readmission (2/144) respectively. At 24-months follow-up, patients who had undergone-R-SADI-S experienced an average weight loss of 60.7 kg, a BMI change of -18.0 kg/m2, a total body weight loss of 44.6% and excess weight loss of 113.7%. R-SADI-S is a seemingly safe procedure which provides excellent weight loss results when performed for patients living with severe obesity. Given R-SADI-S is a novel technique, these results require further ratification once the learning curve is navigated in prospective analyses to ensure the optimisation of patient outcomes.

Obesity Surgery
Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland (IE), Beaumont Hospital (IE), Data Fusion International (Ireland) (IE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Bariatric Surgery and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.