Coevolution of subsystems of society, innovation systems, and development: Chris Freeman and the Latin-American structuralists

Abstract Chris Freeman proposes a reasoned history approach to economic change based on the analysis of the evolution of a set of subsystems of society. These (semi) autonomous but interdependent subsystems transcend the arenas of the economy and technology, and their coevolution is essential to understand how innovation systems evolve. The proposed framework provides a different lens on how to analyse the development process. The Latin-American structuralism built a theory of development that connect industrialization, income distribution, and the role for the State. Industrialization requires increasingly knowledge and technology, and this requires technological capabilities. This article examines Freeman’s approach to National Innovation Systems based on a set of coevolving subsystems that shape the process of economic growth and explore the connexion between these ideas and the postulates of the Latin-American structuralism thought on development. By doing this, the analysis situate Freeman’s contributions in the context of developing countries.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Science and Public Policy
Published
2025-11-21
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaf080
Primary Topic
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coevolution of subsystems of society, innovation systems, and development: Chris Freeman and the Latin-American structuralists

Jose Alexandre O. Vera-Cruz, Martin Puchet Anyul, Gabriela Dutrénit
Science and Public Policy
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
article

Coevolution of subsystems of society, innovation systems, and development: Chris Freeman and the Latin-American structuralists

Jose Alexandre O. Vera-Cruz, Martin Puchet Anyul, Gabriela Dutrénit
article en

Abstract

Abstract Chris Freeman proposes a reasoned history approach to economic change based on the analysis of the evolution of a set of subsystems of society. These (semi) autonomous but interdependent subsystems transcend the arenas of the economy and technology, and their coevolution is essential to understand how innovation systems evolve. The proposed framework provides a different lens on how to analyse the development process. The Latin-American structuralism built a theory of development that connect industrialization, income distribution, and the role for the State. Industrialization requires increasingly knowledge and technology, and this requires technological capabilities. This article examines Freeman’s approach to National Innovation Systems based on a set of coevolving subsystems that shape the process of economic growth and explore the connexion between these ideas and the postulates of the Latin-American structuralism thought on development. By doing this, the analysis situate Freeman’s contributions in the context of developing countries.

Science and Public PolicyVol. 53(1)
Universidad Autónoma de la Ciudad de México (MX), Xerox (France) (FR), Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (MX)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Economic Development and Digital Transformation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.