Wood identification in fiber materials: a comparative blind test study of artificial intelligence and human experts

Abstract The conversion of processes controlled by human expertise and know-how into automated operations is the goal of a wide range of modern research. This study reports on a blind test in which twelve unknown samples were analyzed by human experts and an AI system developed to check the genera of hardwoods used in paper production. Trained to detect hardwood cells in microscopic images of maceration slides, it assigns them to the nine most commonly used hardwood species. Softwoods were also added to the samples, to make the test as realistic as possible. Human experts achieved an accuracy of 0.96 for recognizing a genus contained in a sample. The two-stage machine recognition system achieved an accuracy of 0.79 at the defined threshold values of 0.7 for object recognition and 0.75 for genus probability. Human experts failed to recognize some genera contained in the samples, whereas the AI models did not miss any genus at these thresholds. A comparison of the results revealed the strengths and weaknesses of the independent methods. This study is an important step towards optimizing the automated image recognition system developed to support the implementation of the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) with regard to deforestation-free products/supply chains.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Holzforschung
Published
2026-02-05
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/hf-2025-0099
Primary Topic
Wood and Agarwood Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Wood identification in fiber materials: a comparative blind test study of artificial intelligence and human experts

Henrike Stephani, Immo Heinz, Jördis Sieburg-Rockel, Andrea Olbrich et al.
Holzforschung
Wood and Agarwood Research
article

Wood identification in fiber materials: a comparative blind test study of artificial intelligence and human experts

Henrike Stephani, Immo Heinz, Jördis Sieburg-Rockel, Andrea Olbrich, Thomas Weibel, Stephanie Wrage, Volker Haag, Jonas Heddier, Lars Nieradzik, Stephanie Helmling, Tim Lehne
article en

Abstract

Abstract The conversion of processes controlled by human expertise and know-how into automated operations is the goal of a wide range of modern research. This study reports on a blind test in which twelve unknown samples were analyzed by human experts and an AI system developed to check the genera of hardwoods used in paper production. Trained to detect hardwood cells in microscopic images of maceration slides, it assigns them to the nine most commonly used hardwood species. Softwoods were also added to the samples, to make the test as realistic as possible. Human experts achieved an accuracy of 0.96 for recognizing a genus contained in a sample. The two-stage machine recognition system achieved an accuracy of 0.79 at the defined threshold values of 0.7 for object recognition and 0.75 for genus probability. Human experts failed to recognize some genera contained in the samples, whereas the AI models did not miss any genus at these thresholds. A comparison of the results revealed the strengths and weaknesses of the independent methods. This study is an important step towards optimizing the automated image recognition system developed to support the implementation of the European Union Deforestation Regulation (EUDR) with regard to deforestation-free products/supply chains.

HolzforschungVol. 80(3)
Universität Hamburg (DE), Fraunhofer Institute for Industrial Mathematics (DE), Johann Heinrich von Thünen-Institut (DE), Micro Systems Engineering (Germany) (DE), Hamburg Institut (Germany) (DE)
Life in Land
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Wood and Agarwood Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Wood identification in fiber materials: a comparative blind test study of artificial intelligence and human experts — Henrike Stephani, Immo Heinz, et al. · Holzforschung (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS