Cybersecurity-Driven Machine Learning Approaches for The Web Browser Digital Forensics: A Comparative AnalysisOf Classification Performances on Browser Artifact Data

Selecting a machine learning algorithm with optimal precision, accuracy, and recall has been a major challenge in cybersecurity and digital ‎forensic analysis. Common challenges include difficulty in impact visualization, deterioration in efficiency when datasets are large, the discretized nature of datasets, complex relationships among variables, linearity assumptions, overfitting, and other related issues. In an attempt ‎to mitigate these challenges in practice, this study aims to compare the classification performance of machine learning algorithms applied to ‎web browser extracts in digital forensics. Consequently, the most efficient algorithm is proposed for forensic analysis. The study utilized ‎data from 20 computers, each installed with web browsers including Microsoft Internet Explorer, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Mozilla ‎Firefox, and Opera. Browser extracts were obtained using the Web Browser Forensic Analyzer (WEFA) tool (version 1.2). Browser artefacts were extracted and categorized into history, cache, cookies, typed URLs, sessions, most visited sites, screenshots, downloaded files, ‎favorites, bookmarks, and thumbnails. The dataset consisted of counts of artefacts extracted from the browsers. Data collection was further ‎supported by Firefox Forensic Analyzer and Google Chrome Analyzer tools. The Python programming language was used as the primary ‎tool for implementing and evaluating the performance of the machine learning algorithms. During the implementation process, the study ‎assessed the performance of the Linear Discriminant Algorithm against five competing classification algorithms: Logistic Regression, Decision Tree Classifier, K-Nearest Neighbors, Naive Bayes Classifier, and Support Vector Classifier. The findings revealed that the Linear ‎Discriminant Algorithm outperformed the competing algorithms in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The study therefore ‎concludes that the Linear Discriminant Algorithm is an enhanced and effective approach for classifying browser extracts (artefacts) in digital ‎forensic investigations‎.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Advanced Computer Science & Technology
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.14419/786rgw50
Primary Topic
Digital and Cyber Forensics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Cybersecurity-Driven Machine Learning Approaches for The Web Browser Digital Forensics: A Comparative AnalysisOf Classification Performances on Browser Artifact Data

Asante Michael, Richard Okyere Nkrumah, Angela Nkrumah, Yeboah Andrews Murphy et al.
Journal of Advanced Computer Science & Technology
Digital and Cyber Forensics
article

Cybersecurity-Driven Machine Learning Approaches for The Web Browser Digital Forensics: A Comparative AnalysisOf Classification Performances on Browser Artifact Data

Asante Michael, Richard Okyere Nkrumah, Angela Nkrumah, Yeboah Andrews Murphy, Henry Amoako ‎ Mante, Osei Antwi, Edwin Mends-Brew
article en

Abstract

Selecting a machine learning algorithm with optimal precision, accuracy, and recall has been a major challenge in cybersecurity and digital ‎forensic analysis. Common challenges include difficulty in impact visualization, deterioration in efficiency when datasets are large, the discretized nature of datasets, complex relationships among variables, linearity assumptions, overfitting, and other related issues. In an attempt ‎to mitigate these challenges in practice, this study aims to compare the classification performance of machine learning algorithms applied to ‎web browser extracts in digital forensics. Consequently, the most efficient algorithm is proposed for forensic analysis. The study utilized ‎data from 20 computers, each installed with web browsers including Microsoft Internet Explorer, Microsoft Edge, Google Chrome, Mozilla ‎Firefox, and Opera. Browser extracts were obtained using the Web Browser Forensic Analyzer (WEFA) tool (version 1.2). Browser artefacts were extracted and categorized into history, cache, cookies, typed URLs, sessions, most visited sites, screenshots, downloaded files, ‎favorites, bookmarks, and thumbnails. The dataset consisted of counts of artefacts extracted from the browsers. Data collection was further ‎supported by Firefox Forensic Analyzer and Google Chrome Analyzer tools. The Python programming language was used as the primary ‎tool for implementing and evaluating the performance of the machine learning algorithms. During the implementation process, the study ‎assessed the performance of the Linear Discriminant Algorithm against five competing classification algorithms: Logistic Regression, Decision Tree Classifier, K-Nearest Neighbors, Naive Bayes Classifier, and Support Vector Classifier. The findings revealed that the Linear ‎Discriminant Algorithm outperformed the competing algorithms in terms of accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. The study therefore ‎concludes that the Linear Discriminant Algorithm is an enhanced and effective approach for classifying browser extracts (artefacts) in digital ‎forensic investigations‎.

Journal of Advanced Computer Science & TechnologyVol. 13(1)
Accra Technical University (GH), Kwame Nkrumah University of Science and Technology (GH), Accra Institute of Technology (GH), Kwame Nkrumah University (ZM), Ghana Health Service (GH)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Digital and Cyber Forensics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.