MLKL in liver parenchymal cells promotes liver cancer in murine metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease
The rising prevalence of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in the last decade is mostly attributable to the growing epidemic of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver diseases (MASLD). However, the transition from steatosis to steatohepatitis (MASH) and ultimately to HCC is not fully understood. As an executioner protein of necroptosis, the mixed-lineage kinase domain-like protein (MLKL) has been proposed to contribute to MASH and HCC development. To investigate its role in disease progression, mice whose liver parenchymal cells (LPCs) no longer expressed MLKL (Mlkl<sup>LPC-KO</sup>) were compared to their control counterparts (Mlkl<sup>fl/fl</sup>) using an experimental model combining diabetes induction and a high-fat high-sugar diet (HFHSD) for 4, 8, or 12 weeks. Notably, HFHSD failed to induce detectable hepatic necroptosis in Mlkl<sup>fl/fl</sup> mice, with no phosphorylated MLKL observed by Western blot. Both genotypes displayed similar steatosis and mild fibrosis, consistent with comparable MASH severity, and this condition progressed to HCC. Interestingly, the incidence of liver tumors in Mlkl<sup>LPC-KO</sup> mice was significantly reduced, which was associated with a delay in the onset of systemic and hepatic inflammation. At the early stage of the disease (4th week), the absence of MLKL in LPCs appeared to confer a protective effect on the liver, reducing metabolic stress, as reflected by a lower ceramide-to- sphingomyelin ratio, along with oxidative stress and DNA damage. Altogether, our data suggest that MLKL in LPCs contributes to HCC initiation in the context of MASH, potentially involving its described non-canonical role within mitochondria, promoting oxidative stress, a cancer hallmark. This study provides new insights into evaluating the therapeutic potential of targeting MLKL, as its inhibition in LPCs may represent an effective strategy for treating MASH-related HCC.
Authors
- Céline Raguénès‐Nicol (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8428-9558)
- Ghiles Imerzoukene (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-6814-8978)
- Thibaut Larcher (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0396-3190)
- Jacques Le Seyec (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1118-3311)
- Claire Piquet‐Pellorce (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3198-1975)
- Céline Heitz‐Marchaland
- Annaïg Hamon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1662-1405)
- Ghania Hounana Kara-Ali (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4004-7551)
- Aurore Bidon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-9308-584X)
- Mélanie Simoes Eugénio
- Nicolas Loiseau
- Sarah Dion
- Laurence Dubreil
- Michel Samson
- Gevorg Ghukasyan
- Marie-Thérèse Dimanche-Boitrel
Institutions
- Inserm (FR)
- École des Hautes Études en Santé Publique (FR)
- École Nationale Vétérinaire de Toulouse (FR)
- Université Rennes 2 (FR)
- Institut National de Recherche pour l'Agriculture, l'Alimentation et l'Environnement (FR)
- Toxicologie Alimentaire (FR)
- Institut de Recherche en Santé, Environnement et Travail (FR)
- Oniris (FR)
- Université de Rennes (FR)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Cell Death and Disease
- Published
- 2026-02-19
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41419-026-08458-x
- Primary Topic
- Cell death mechanisms and regulation
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00