Piston press extrusion as a low-cost screening tool for cementitious formulations in 3D concrete printing

The commercialization of 3D concrete printing (3DCP) technology is rapidly advancing. However, building-scale field demonstrations and trials reveal that there are shortcomings that hamper its implementation in the construction industry. One critical challenge is the development of cementitious formulations compatible with the wide range of printer platforms and their use in relevant environments. Academic and start-up research and development (R&D) teams’ work is limited by the excessive upfront costs of large-scale 3DCP printers, as well as high costs of consumables, and replacement parts when experimental results do not go as expected. This work introduces how cementitious formulations can be tested using an inexpensive piston press to quickly evaluate the printability of experimental cementitious formulations. The results demonstrate the use of a piston press to screen materials for extrusion and layer-by-layer builds of cementitious formulations. This low-cost approach streamlines the validation of new formulations compatible with 3DCP. The approach can facilitate the transition of 3DCP materials from bench-scale R&D to practical civil engineering applications.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Academia Engineering
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.20935/acadeng8136
Primary Topic
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Piston press extrusion as a low-cost screening tool for cementitious formulations in 3D concrete printing

Jeffery R. Owens, Charles Nikon, Glenn R. Johnson, Matthew J. Catenacci
Academia Engineering
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
article

Piston press extrusion as a low-cost screening tool for cementitious formulations in 3D concrete printing

Jeffery R. Owens, Charles Nikon, Glenn R. Johnson, Matthew J. Catenacci
article en

Abstract

The commercialization of 3D concrete printing (3DCP) technology is rapidly advancing. However, building-scale field demonstrations and trials reveal that there are shortcomings that hamper its implementation in the construction industry. One critical challenge is the development of cementitious formulations compatible with the wide range of printer platforms and their use in relevant environments. Academic and start-up research and development (R&D) teams’ work is limited by the excessive upfront costs of large-scale 3DCP printers, as well as high costs of consumables, and replacement parts when experimental results do not go as expected. This work introduces how cementitious formulations can be tested using an inexpensive piston press to quickly evaluate the printability of experimental cementitious formulations. The results demonstrate the use of a piston press to screen materials for extrusion and layer-by-layer builds of cementitious formulations. This low-cost approach streamlines the validation of new formulations compatible with 3DCP. The approach can facilitate the transition of 3DCP materials from bench-scale R&D to practical civil engineering applications.

Academia EngineeringVol. 3(1)
Battelle (US), Patrick Air Force Base (US), United States Air Force (US)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Piston press extrusion as a low-cost screening tool for cementitious formulations in 3D concrete printing — Jeffery R. Owens, Charles Nikon, et al. · Academia Engineering (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS