Evolution of care pathways in clinical practice guidelines for heart failure: a systematic review with narrative synthesis

This study provides a systematic review with narrative synthesis of Heart Failure (HF) Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) published by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) between 2000 and 2023. The objective was to describe the evolution of the HF care pathway and to identify its current key components. The review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 standards and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024551462). Methodological quality was assessed using the AGREE II instrument, and Class I recommendations were extracted for thematic analysis. Fourteen CPGs were included. Over the past two decades, guideline quality has progressively improved, and the total number of recommendations increased by 344.6%. Five major components of the HF care pathway were identified: initial assessment and diagnosis; pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment; comorbidity management; multidisciplinary care; and management of acute HF hospitalization. Although CPGs have significantly expanded and refined the structure of optimal HF care, the growing volume of recommendations may limit their practical applicability, highlighting the need for strategies that facilitate implementation within complex healthcare systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18683609
Primary Topic
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evolution of care pathways in clinical practice guidelines for heart failure: a systematic review with narrative synthesis

Eduardo Millán-Ortuondo, Juan Jose Gomez Doblas, Francisco Estupiñán Romero, Enrique Bernal-Delgado et al.
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
article

Evolution of care pathways in clinical practice guidelines for heart failure: a systematic review with narrative synthesis

Eduardo Millán-Ortuondo, Juan Jose Gomez Doblas, Francisco Estupiñán Romero, Enrique Bernal-Delgado, Quiros Lopez Raul
article en

Abstract

This study provides a systematic review with narrative synthesis of Heart Failure (HF) Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) published by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the American Heart Association (AHA) between 2000 and 2023. The objective was to describe the evolution of the HF care pathway and to identify its current key components. The review was conducted according to PRISMA 2020 standards and registered in PROSPERO (CRD42024551462). Methodological quality was assessed using the AGREE II instrument, and Class I recommendations were extracted for thematic analysis. Fourteen CPGs were included. Over the past two decades, guideline quality has progressively improved, and the total number of recommendations increased by 344.6%. Five major components of the HF care pathway were identified: initial assessment and diagnosis; pharmacological and non-pharmacological treatment; comorbidity management; multidisciplinary care; and management of acute HF hospitalization. Although CPGs have significantly expanded and refined the structure of optimal HF care, the growing volume of recommendations may limit their practical applicability, highlighting the need for strategies that facilitate implementation within complex healthcare systems.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Andalusian Health Service (ES), Bellvitge University Hospital (ES), Hospital Costa del Sol (ES), Universidad Internacional (MX), Osakidetza (ES), Instituto Aragonés de Ciencias de la Salud (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Clinical practice guidelines implementation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.