Farm‐scale Natural Capital Accounting: Unlocking the potential of natural capital to support sustainable agriculture

Abstract The demand for information about property‐scale natural capital is growing rapidly as producers and supply chains respond to opportunities and pressures to report environmental performance information. Natural Capital Accounting offers promise but agreed methods for farm‐scale accounts are currently lacking. Here, we propose a framework, methods and models to quantify on‐farm natural capital and ecosystem services that support agricultural production. The accounts are outcomes‐based, data‐driven, transparent and repeatable. We demonstrate that our accounts are conceptually consistent with the UN System of Environmental‐Economic Accounting Ecosystem Accounting, although they do differ in two main ways: (i) we combine information on Ecosystem Type and Ecosystem Condition into a single indicator of Ecosystem State; and (ii) we use ecological models to derive indicators of the ability of Ecosystem Assets to generate a range of ecosystem services. Our approach integrates farm operational and production data, remote sensed imagery and data, ecological modelling and state and transition models to generate accounts that contain verifiable information about the extent and condition of natural capital assets, indicators of the ability of these assets to generate a range of intermediate and final ecosystem services (e.g. habitat maintenance for biodiversity, forage for livestock, carbon sequestration, pollination, soil regulation, shade and shelter) and environmental performance at the farm scale. The accounts are underpinned by ecological models, built from empirical (field‐tested) data, of the relationship between natural capital and measures of biodiversity and ecosystem services. We have demonstrated the practicality of our approach by producing farm‐scale accounts for 50 farms in south‐eastern Australia. Our accounts provide farmers with detailed information that could be used for sustainability reporting and the promotion of sustainable farm practices. Simultaneously, our accounts provide the agricultural supply chain with transparent information on the environmental performance of farming entities, helping to overcome false or exaggerated claims of sustainability by companies and retailers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/2041-210x.70245
Primary Topic
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Farm‐scale Natural Capital Accounting: Unlocking the potential of natural capital to support sustainable agriculture

Grace J. Sutton, Imogen Semmler, Sue Ogilvy, Alex C. Maisey et al.
Methods in Ecology and Evolution
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
article

Farm‐scale Natural Capital Accounting: Unlocking the potential of natural capital to support sustainable agriculture

Grace J. Sutton, Imogen Semmler, Sue Ogilvy, Alex C. Maisey, Rachel Lawrence, James Q. Radford, Frederick W. Rainsford, Daniel O'Brien
article en

Abstract

Abstract The demand for information about property‐scale natural capital is growing rapidly as producers and supply chains respond to opportunities and pressures to report environmental performance information. Natural Capital Accounting offers promise but agreed methods for farm‐scale accounts are currently lacking. Here, we propose a framework, methods and models to quantify on‐farm natural capital and ecosystem services that support agricultural production. The accounts are outcomes‐based, data‐driven, transparent and repeatable. We demonstrate that our accounts are conceptually consistent with the UN System of Environmental‐Economic Accounting Ecosystem Accounting, although they do differ in two main ways: (i) we combine information on Ecosystem Type and Ecosystem Condition into a single indicator of Ecosystem State; and (ii) we use ecological models to derive indicators of the ability of Ecosystem Assets to generate a range of ecosystem services. Our approach integrates farm operational and production data, remote sensed imagery and data, ecological modelling and state and transition models to generate accounts that contain verifiable information about the extent and condition of natural capital assets, indicators of the ability of these assets to generate a range of intermediate and final ecosystem services (e.g. habitat maintenance for biodiversity, forage for livestock, carbon sequestration, pollination, soil regulation, shade and shelter) and environmental performance at the farm scale. The accounts are underpinned by ecological models, built from empirical (field‐tested) data, of the relationship between natural capital and measures of biodiversity and ecosystem services. We have demonstrated the practicality of our approach by producing farm‐scale accounts for 50 farms in south‐eastern Australia. Our accounts provide farmers with detailed information that could be used for sustainability reporting and the promotion of sustainable farm practices. Simultaneously, our accounts provide the agricultural supply chain with transparent information on the environmental performance of farming entities, helping to overcome false or exaggerated claims of sustainability by companies and retailers.

Methods in Ecology and Evolution
La Trobe University (AU), Futures Group (United States) (US)
Australian Government
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Land Use and Ecosystem Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.