Biomechanical Evaluation of Head Acceleration and Kinematics in Boxing: The Role of Gloves and Helmets—A Pilot Study

Head injuries remain one of the major health concerns in contact sports such as boxing. Despite the widespread use of protective gloves and helmets, their biomechanical effectiveness in mitigating head acceleration and reducing brain injury risk remains uncertain. This study aims to biomechanically assess available boxing equipment solutions and identify the brain–skull system’s response to physical forces from a boxing punch. A dedicated experimental setup was developed using mini triaxial accelerometers and a high-speed camera to measure head accelerations in a Primus unbreakable dummy. Tests were performed using gloves of different masses (0 oz, 10 oz, and 16 oz) and three head protection configurations: no helmet, rugby helmet, and boxing helmet. The resultant accelerations were analyzed and compared across test conditions. Peak wrist accelerations ranged from 195.00 to 271.77 m/s2, while head accelerations did not exceed biomechanical injury thresholds. The boxing helmet, composed of multilayer polyurethane foam, did not consistently decrease acceleration; in some cases, it produced higher overloads due to increased head mass and moment of inertia. A rugby helmet made of open-cell EVA (ethylene vinyl acetate) foam with lower density exhibited more favorable energy-dissipation characteristics under low-impact conditions. Glove mass also influenced acceleration differently between male and female participants, likely due to variations in punch velocity and force generation. This work is a pilot study using two trained adult volunteers to validate the combined IMU–video measurement framework. The results serve as hypothesis-generating mechanistic observations rather than population-level effect estimates. Protective effectiveness in boxing depends on a complex interaction between material properties, geometry, and user biomechanics. Optimal equipment design should balance energy absorption and mass to minimize both linear and rotational accelerations. Future studies should integrate advanced material modeling and finite element simulations to support the development of adaptive, lightweight protective systems.