Benchmarking edgeR and methylKit for the Detection of Differential DNA Methylation: A Methodological Evaluation

Despite the improvements in tool development for DNA methylation analysis, there is a lack of a consensus on computational and statistical models used for differentially methylated cytosine (DMC) identification. This variability complicates the interpretation of findings and raises concerns about the reproducibility and biological significance of the detected results. In this regard, here we conducted a comparative evaluation of <i>edgeR</i> and <i>methylKit</i> tools to assess their performance, concordance, and biological relevance in detecting DMCs following a morphine exposure model in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). Both pipelines were applied to the same WGBS dataset (GEO accession number: GSE292082), and concordance was calculated at both single-base and gene levels. Although the total number of DMCs identified differed between tools, both pipelines detected a global hypomethylation pattern. Genomic distribution analysis revealed that DMCs predominantly localized to intergenic and intronic regions, as well as to open sea regions. Despite differences in sensitivity, both pipelines demonstrated moderate concordance at the DMC level (~56%) and high concordance at the gene level (~90%), identifying largely overlapping sets of differentially methylated genes (DMGs). Comparative assessments further showed that the choice of statistical metric can influence the perceived magnitude of biological effects. Sensitivity analyses indicated that threshold selection and normalization methods influence DMC detection, whereas aggregation at gene level reduces discrepancies. Overall, our findings underscore the complementary strengths of <i>methylKit</i> and <i>edgeR</i> and highlight the importance of careful tool selection for epigenetic studies. As a conclusion, we recommend integrating both pipelines to ensure a balanced interpretation of effect sizes, particularly in studies with complex experimental designs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms27041964
Primary Topic
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking edgeR and methylKit for the Detection of Differential DNA Methylation: A Methodological Evaluation

Nerea Subirán, Iraia Muñoa-Hoyos, Mikel Albizuri, Manu Araolaza et al.
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
article

Benchmarking edgeR and methylKit for the Detection of Differential DNA Methylation: A Methodological Evaluation

Nerea Subirán, Iraia Muñoa-Hoyos, Mikel Albizuri, Manu Araolaza, Irune Calzado
article en

Abstract

Despite the improvements in tool development for DNA methylation analysis, there is a lack of a consensus on computational and statistical models used for differentially methylated cytosine (DMC) identification. This variability complicates the interpretation of findings and raises concerns about the reproducibility and biological significance of the detected results. In this regard, here we conducted a comparative evaluation of <i>edgeR</i> and <i>methylKit</i> tools to assess their performance, concordance, and biological relevance in detecting DMCs following a morphine exposure model in mouse embryonic stem cells (mESCs). Both pipelines were applied to the same WGBS dataset (GEO accession number: GSE292082), and concordance was calculated at both single-base and gene levels. Although the total number of DMCs identified differed between tools, both pipelines detected a global hypomethylation pattern. Genomic distribution analysis revealed that DMCs predominantly localized to intergenic and intronic regions, as well as to open sea regions. Despite differences in sensitivity, both pipelines demonstrated moderate concordance at the DMC level (~56%) and high concordance at the gene level (~90%), identifying largely overlapping sets of differentially methylated genes (DMGs). Comparative assessments further showed that the choice of statistical metric can influence the perceived magnitude of biological effects. Sensitivity analyses indicated that threshold selection and normalization methods influence DMC detection, whereas aggregation at gene level reduces discrepancies. Overall, our findings underscore the complementary strengths of <i>methylKit</i> and <i>edgeR</i> and highlight the importance of careful tool selection for epigenetic studies. As a conclusion, we recommend integrating both pipelines to ensure a balanced interpretation of effect sizes, particularly in studies with complex experimental designs.

International Journal of Molecular SciencesVol. 27(4)
University of the Basque Country (ES), BioCruces Health research Institute (ES), Euskadiko Parke Teknologikoa (ES)
Life below water
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.