Standardized patient gender influences diagnostic accuracy in undergraduate medical students’ cardiac OSCE interviews

<b>Objectives</b>: This study aimed to assess the influence of standardized patient and student gender on the undergraduate medical students' performance during the interview station of Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCE). <b>Methods</b>: This study was conducted among fourth-year medical students during an OSCE at the University of Toulouse, France. Standardized patients, examiners, and students were blinded to the study design. Four gender-neutral clinical cases were developed, involving cardiac diagnoses: case 1: acute coronary syndrome; case 2: musculoskeletal chest pain; case 3: cardiac arrhythmias with acute coronary syndrome; case 4: vasovagal syncope. The primary outcome was the diagnostic hypothesis proposed by the student at the end of the standardized patient interview. <b>Results</b>: A total of 357 fourth-year students were assessed. The mean age of the students was 22 years (±2.6) and 225 (63.0%) were female. Ten standardized patients were involved, (7 female, median age: 51 [IQR 44-60]; 3 male, median age: 55 [IQR 50-59]). The rate of correct diagnostic hypotheses was significantly higher with male standardized patients (64.9% [95% CI, 55.0%-73.7%]) than with female standardized patients (45.6% [95% CI, 39.5%-51.8%]; <i>p</i> = 0.002). Female students were also less likely to propose correct diagnoses with female standardized patients (40% vs. 66.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.003) compared to male students (50% vs. 62%, <i>p</i> = 0.25). <b>Conclusion</b>: Our study supports that diagnostic hypothesis proposed by undergraduate medical students at the interview station during OSCEs is influenced by standardized patient gender, with a higher likelihood of incorrect diagnoses when the standardized patient is female, despite gender-neutral clinical cases. Diagnostic accuracy may also be influenced by student gender. These findings suggest that gender bias exists from the early stages of medical training.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medical Teacher
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/0142159x.2026.2631741
Primary Topic
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Standardized patient gender influences diagnostic accuracy in undergraduate medical students’ cardiac OSCE interviews

Charles Henri Houzé-Cerfon, Émilie Montastier, Xavier Dubucs, Odile Rauzy et al.
Medical Teacher
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
article

Standardized patient gender influences diagnostic accuracy in undergraduate medical students’ cardiac OSCE interviews

Charles Henri Houzé-Cerfon, Émilie Montastier, Xavier Dubucs, Odile Rauzy, Marie Faruch, Thomas Geeraerts, Audrey Richard
article en

Abstract

<b>Objectives</b>: This study aimed to assess the influence of standardized patient and student gender on the undergraduate medical students' performance during the interview station of Objective Structured Clinical Examinations (OSCE). <b>Methods</b>: This study was conducted among fourth-year medical students during an OSCE at the University of Toulouse, France. Standardized patients, examiners, and students were blinded to the study design. Four gender-neutral clinical cases were developed, involving cardiac diagnoses: case 1: acute coronary syndrome; case 2: musculoskeletal chest pain; case 3: cardiac arrhythmias with acute coronary syndrome; case 4: vasovagal syncope. The primary outcome was the diagnostic hypothesis proposed by the student at the end of the standardized patient interview. <b>Results</b>: A total of 357 fourth-year students were assessed. The mean age of the students was 22 years (±2.6) and 225 (63.0%) were female. Ten standardized patients were involved, (7 female, median age: 51 [IQR 44-60]; 3 male, median age: 55 [IQR 50-59]). The rate of correct diagnostic hypotheses was significantly higher with male standardized patients (64.9% [95% CI, 55.0%-73.7%]) than with female standardized patients (45.6% [95% CI, 39.5%-51.8%]; <i>p</i> = 0.002). Female students were also less likely to propose correct diagnoses with female standardized patients (40% vs. 66.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.003) compared to male students (50% vs. 62%, <i>p</i> = 0.25). <b>Conclusion</b>: Our study supports that diagnostic hypothesis proposed by undergraduate medical students at the interview station during OSCEs is influenced by standardized patient gender, with a higher likelihood of incorrect diagnoses when the standardized patient is female, despite gender-neutral clinical cases. Diagnostic accuracy may also be influenced by student gender. These findings suggest that gender bias exists from the early stages of medical training.

Medical Teacher
NIIT (India) (IN), Université Toulouse III - Paul Sabatier (FR), Université Fédérale de Toulouse Midi-Pyrénées (FR), University of Medical Technology Yangon (MM), Institut universitaire du cancer de Toulouse Oncopole (FR), Société Française de Médecine d'Urgence (FR)
Quality Education
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.