Neuronale maschinelle und KI-generierte Übersetzungen: Versuch einer Kategorisierung von Stärken und Schwächen in der Sprachkombination Spanisch-Deutsch

Abstract Neural machine translation has fundamentally changed the practice of translation for more than a decade. The translation industry is now undergoing another fundamental transformation due to advances in generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in the form of large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT. For professional translators, however, automatically generated translations are primarily a productivity tool. This process is known as MTPE (machine translation post-editing) and involves combining machine translations with human expertise. This article identifies and categorizes the strengths and weaknesses of automatically generated translations using a series of examples. To this end, the neural machine translation systems DeepL and Google Translate were compared with ChatGPT’s GPT-4o large language model, both with the source text and with each other. The results show that the examined automatic translations offer numerous advantages and are changing the translation profession extensively. However, they are not yet capable of ensuring an accurate translation, meaning that checking or post-editing by a human translator remains necessary.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lebende Sprachen
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1515/les-2025-0055
Primary Topic
Natural Language Processing Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Neuronale maschinelle und KI-generierte Übersetzungen: Versuch einer Kategorisierung von Stärken und Schwächen in der Sprachkombination Spanisch-Deutsch

Christiane Limbach, Juan Cuartero Otal
Lebende Sprachen
Natural Language Processing Techniques
article

Neuronale maschinelle und KI-generierte Übersetzungen: Versuch einer Kategorisierung von Stärken und Schwächen in der Sprachkombination Spanisch-Deutsch

Christiane Limbach, Juan Cuartero Otal
article en

Abstract

Abstract Neural machine translation has fundamentally changed the practice of translation for more than a decade. The translation industry is now undergoing another fundamental transformation due to advances in generative artificial intelligence (GenAI) in the form of large language models (LLMs), such as ChatGPT. For professional translators, however, automatically generated translations are primarily a productivity tool. This process is known as MTPE (machine translation post-editing) and involves combining machine translations with human expertise. This article identifies and categorizes the strengths and weaknesses of automatically generated translations using a series of examples. To this end, the neural machine translation systems DeepL and Google Translate were compared with ChatGPT’s GPT-4o large language model, both with the source text and with each other. The results show that the examined automatic translations offer numerous advantages and are changing the translation profession extensively. However, they are not yet capable of ensuring an accurate translation, meaning that checking or post-editing by a human translator remains necessary.

Lebende Sprachen
Universidad Pablo de Olavide (ES)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Natural Language Processing Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Neuronale maschinelle und KI-generierte Übersetzungen: Versuch einer Kategorisierung von Stärken und Schwächen in der Sprachkombination Spanisch-Deutsch — Christiane Limbach, Juan Cuartero Otal · Lebende Sprachen (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS