Efficacy of the intensive care unit diary: a mixed-method study protocol

Background Multiple international studies report on the use of diaries in intensive care units focusing on benefits for patients, families, and occasionally professionals. Most studies use quantitative methods and have limitations such as small sample sizes and short follow-ups. Therefore, further research with larger samples and a longer follow-up period, employing a mixed-methods approach is suggested. This protocol aims to assess the efficacy of the use of intensive care unit diaries for patients and families and explore professionals’ experiences and satisfaction. Method/Design Mixed-method study: a quantitative phase followed by a qualitative phase. Phase 1: Randomised, parallel, non-blinded, multicentre clinical trial, with an experimental group (diary) and a control group (no diary), to identify the efficacy of the diary in improving quality of life and preventing post-traumatic stress and anxiety/ depression in patients and family. Measurement tools include the SF-36 Health Questionnaire, EIE-R scale, and HADS scale, administered 2-, 6- and 12-months post-discharge. Each group comprises 120 cases. Data analysis will use IBM-SPSS (v.24) To evaluate the satisfaction of professionals a survey will be carried out. Phase 2: Hermeneutic phenomenological study with theoretical sampling. Size of 38–72 patients/family members until theoretical data saturation is reached. Data collection from in-depth interviews and field diary 6 months after discharge. Phenomenological analysis according to Smith. Guba and Lincoln’s rigour criteria. Discussion This research will provide knowledge regarding the benefits and limitations of the use of diaries, based on quantitative and qualitative data, and will promote reflection on their implementation, considering patients, family, and professionals. This study will provide new knowledge about the satisfaction of professionals with diary implementation. This multicentre study will provide valuable information on the contribution of diaries in clinical practice and their impact on patient recovery and the experiences of families and professionals. If the efficacy of the diary is confirmed, it will mark a significant advancement in the care of critically ill patients, contributing to the expansion of their use.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona)
Published
2026-01-19
Primary Topic
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Efficacy of the intensive care unit diary: a mixed-method study protocol

S. Alonso-Fernández, Albert Ausió-Dot, Carlos Tur-Rubio, Pilar Delgado-Hito et al.
Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona)
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
article

Efficacy of the intensive care unit diary: a mixed-method study protocol

S. Alonso-Fernández, Albert Ausió-Dot, Carlos Tur-Rubio, Pilar Delgado-Hito, Marta Romero García, M. Pilar Muñoz Rey, I. Anglès-Sabatè, Isidro Alcalá Jiménez, Ariadna Huertas Zurriaga
article en

Abstract

Background Multiple international studies report on the use of diaries in intensive care units focusing on benefits for patients, families, and occasionally professionals. Most studies use quantitative methods and have limitations such as small sample sizes and short follow-ups. Therefore, further research with larger samples and a longer follow-up period, employing a mixed-methods approach is suggested. This protocol aims to assess the efficacy of the use of intensive care unit diaries for patients and families and explore professionals’ experiences and satisfaction. Method/Design Mixed-method study: a quantitative phase followed by a qualitative phase. Phase 1: Randomised, parallel, non-blinded, multicentre clinical trial, with an experimental group (diary) and a control group (no diary), to identify the efficacy of the diary in improving quality of life and preventing post-traumatic stress and anxiety/ depression in patients and family. Measurement tools include the SF-36 Health Questionnaire, EIE-R scale, and HADS scale, administered 2-, 6- and 12-months post-discharge. Each group comprises 120 cases. Data analysis will use IBM-SPSS (v.24) To evaluate the satisfaction of professionals a survey will be carried out. Phase 2: Hermeneutic phenomenological study with theoretical sampling. Size of 38–72 patients/family members until theoretical data saturation is reached. Data collection from in-depth interviews and field diary 6 months after discharge. Phenomenological analysis according to Smith. Guba and Lincoln’s rigour criteria. Discussion This research will provide knowledge regarding the benefits and limitations of the use of diaries, based on quantitative and qualitative data, and will promote reflection on their implementation, considering patients, family, and professionals. This study will provide new knowledge about the satisfaction of professionals with diary implementation. This multicentre study will provide valuable information on the contribution of diaries in clinical practice and their impact on patient recovery and the experiences of families and professionals. If the efficacy of the diary is confirmed, it will mark a significant advancement in the care of critically ill patients, contributing to the expansion of their use.

Dipòsit Digital de la Universitat de Barcelona (Universitat de Barcelona)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Family and Patient Care in Intensive Care Units
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.