Reliability and Validity of Non-Invasive Electrical Detection and Pain Thresholds Using PainVision® in Healthy Young Adults

Shiya Yu,1,2 Zhimo Yang,1,2 Baoyu Chen,1,2 Lisheng Wang,1,2 Jielei Huang,1,2 Li Gou,1,2 Lin Yang1,2 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Center, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People’s Republic of China; 2Rehabilitation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Lin Yang, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Center, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]: Electrical detection threshold (EDT) and electrical pain threshold (EPT) measured via PainVision® offer a non-invasive method to objectively assess sensory function, directly targeting specific nerve fibers. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and preliminary validity of EDT and EPT across different anatomical sites in healthy young adults.Patients and Methods: Forty-six participants underwent EDT and EPT assessments at four sites across two sessions separated by 2– 3 days. Pain intensity at the medial forearm was recorded using the visual analogue scale (VAS) following 30-second electrical stimulation. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and minimal detectable changes (MDC) were calculated, and correlations between EPT and VAS were analyzed.Results: EDT and EPT showed good to excellent reliability (ICC 0.75– 0.95 and 0.83– 0.99, respectively). MDC ranged from 1.26– 1.81 for EDT and 1.18– 1.99 for EPT. EPT was negatively correlated with VAS scores (r = − 0.746, 95% CI [− 0.852, − 0.582]).Conclusion: EDT and EPT measurements using PainVision® demonstrated robust reliability and preliminary validity in healthy young adults, highlighting their potential as a standardized, non-invasive tool for assessing electrical sensory thresholds. This study provides baseline data for future research in clinical populations.Keywords: electrical detection threshold, electrical pain threshold, reliability, validity, pain assessment

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Published
2026-02-17
Primary Topic
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Reliability and Validity of Non-Invasive Electrical Detection and Pain Thresholds Using PainVision® in Healthy Young Adults

Zhimo Yang, Shiya Yu, Lei Wang, Baoyu Chen et al.
Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
article

Reliability and Validity of Non-Invasive Electrical Detection and Pain Thresholds Using PainVision® in Healthy Young Adults

Zhimo Yang, Shiya Yu, Lei Wang, Baoyu Chen, Li Gou, Jielei Huang, Lin F. Yang
article en

Abstract

Shiya Yu,1,2 Zhimo Yang,1,2 Baoyu Chen,1,2 Lisheng Wang,1,2 Jielei Huang,1,2 Li Gou,1,2 Lin Yang1,2 1Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Center, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People’s Republic of China; 2Rehabilitation Key Laboratory of Sichuan Province, West China Hospital, Sichuan University, Chengdu, People’s Republic of ChinaCorrespondence: Lin Yang, Department of Rehabilitation Medicine Center, Sichuan University West China Hospital, Chengdu, Sichuan, 610041, People’s Republic of China, Email [email protected]: Electrical detection threshold (EDT) and electrical pain threshold (EPT) measured via PainVision® offer a non-invasive method to objectively assess sensory function, directly targeting specific nerve fibers. This study aimed to evaluate the reliability and preliminary validity of EDT and EPT across different anatomical sites in healthy young adults.Patients and Methods: Forty-six participants underwent EDT and EPT assessments at four sites across two sessions separated by 2– 3 days. Pain intensity at the medial forearm was recorded using the visual analogue scale (VAS) following 30-second electrical stimulation. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) and minimal detectable changes (MDC) were calculated, and correlations between EPT and VAS were analyzed.Results: EDT and EPT showed good to excellent reliability (ICC 0.75– 0.95 and 0.83– 0.99, respectively). MDC ranged from 1.26– 1.81 for EDT and 1.18– 1.99 for EPT. EPT was negatively correlated with VAS scores (r = − 0.746, 95% CI [− 0.852, − 0.582]).Conclusion: EDT and EPT measurements using PainVision® demonstrated robust reliability and preliminary validity in healthy young adults, highlighting their potential as a standardized, non-invasive tool for assessing electrical sensory thresholds. This study provides baseline data for future research in clinical populations.Keywords: electrical detection threshold, electrical pain threshold, reliability, validity, pain assessment

Dove Medical Press (Taylor and Francis Group)
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Pain Mechanisms and Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.