Enhancing Surgical Efficiency and Cost-Effectiveness With TaTME-Combined Robot-Assisted Surgery for Lower Rectal Cancer

Background: Robot-assisted rectal surgery (RAS) offers improved dexterity and visualization; however, the high cost of equipment and consumables remains a major challenge for hospital management. At our institution, we have adopted a combined approach using transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for lower rectal cancers, aiming to shorten operative time and enable two procedures per day to improve cost-efficiency. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 112 patients who underwent RAS for rectal cancer between 2019 and 2024, excluding those requiring lateral lymph node dissection. Patients were divided into a robotic-only group (Ra/RS tumors, n = 75) and a TaTME-combined group (Rb tumors, n = 37). Surgical outcomes and institutional profitability per case were compared, including the number of cases performed twice daily. Results: Despite much lower tumor height from the anal verge (3 vs. 10 cm, p < 0.001), the TaTME-combined group showed significantly shorter operative time than the robotic-only group (235 vs. 317 min, p < 0.001). Two-case-per-day robotic operations were achieved in 73.0% of the TaTME-combined group (27 patients) compared to only 20% in the robotic-only group (15 patients). Oncological outcomes and complication rates were comparable between the groups. In the TaTME-combined group, performing two procedures per day resulted in a greater gross profit per case (JPY 321 800/case) compared to performing one conventional robotic LAR per day (JPY 224 300/case). Conclusions: TaTME-combined RAS for lower rectal cancer enables efficient surgical scheduling and improved cost-effectiveness while maintaining oncological safety. This strategy holds promise as a model for economically sustainable rectal cancer care.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Kobe University Repository Kernel (Kobe University)
Published
2025-11-22
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing Surgical Efficiency and Cost-Effectiveness With TaTME-Combined Robot-Assisted Surgery for Lower Rectal Cancer

Yasufumi Koterazawa, Tomoaki Aoki, Shingo Kanaji, 丈明 青木 et al.
Kobe University Repository Kernel (Kobe University)
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
article

Enhancing Surgical Efficiency and Cost-Effectiveness With TaTME-Combined Robot-Assisted Surgery for Lower Rectal Cancer

Yasufumi Koterazawa, Tomoaki Aoki, Shingo Kanaji, 丈明 青木, 康文 小寺澤, ヨシヒロ カケジ, Takeru Matsuda, Hironobu Goto, 寛 長谷川, ヒロシ ハセガワ, 新悟 金治, Yoshihiro Kakeji, ナオキ ウラカワ, Yasunori Otowa, 直樹 裏川, 裕信 後藤, Naoki Urakawa, ヒロノブ ゴトウ, トモアキ アオキ, Hiroshi Hasegawa, シンゴ カナジ, タケル マツダ, 泰則 音羽, ヤスフミ コテラザワ, 吉弘 掛地, ヤスノリ オトワ, 武 松田, Masayuki Ando
article en

Abstract

Background: Robot-assisted rectal surgery (RAS) offers improved dexterity and visualization; however, the high cost of equipment and consumables remains a major challenge for hospital management. At our institution, we have adopted a combined approach using transanal total mesorectal excision (TaTME) for lower rectal cancers, aiming to shorten operative time and enable two procedures per day to improve cost-efficiency. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included 112 patients who underwent RAS for rectal cancer between 2019 and 2024, excluding those requiring lateral lymph node dissection. Patients were divided into a robotic-only group (Ra/RS tumors, n = 75) and a TaTME-combined group (Rb tumors, n = 37). Surgical outcomes and institutional profitability per case were compared, including the number of cases performed twice daily. Results: Despite much lower tumor height from the anal verge (3 vs. 10 cm, p < 0.001), the TaTME-combined group showed significantly shorter operative time than the robotic-only group (235 vs. 317 min, p < 0.001). Two-case-per-day robotic operations were achieved in 73.0% of the TaTME-combined group (27 patients) compared to only 20% in the robotic-only group (15 patients). Oncological outcomes and complication rates were comparable between the groups. In the TaTME-combined group, performing two procedures per day resulted in a greater gross profit per case (JPY 321 800/case) compared to performing one conventional robotic LAR per day (JPY 224 300/case). Conclusions: TaTME-combined RAS for lower rectal cancer enables efficient surgical scheduling and improved cost-effectiveness while maintaining oncological safety. This strategy holds promise as a model for economically sustainable rectal cancer care.

Kobe University Repository Kernel (Kobe University)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Colorectal Cancer Surgical Treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.