Multicenter Study From 22 Expert Centers

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify benchmark values for robotic right hepatectomy (RH) based on a low-risk cohort treated at expert centers. BACKGROUND: Robotic liver surgery is emerging as a preferred minimally invasive approach to the liver. To enable conclusive comparisons with the standard open or laparoscopic approaches, reference values are needed. METHODS: Outcomes from consecutive patients undergoing robotic RH for malignant or benign indications at 22 international expert centers between 2018 and 2024 were analyzed. Low-risk, benchmark patients were without significant comorbidities such as portal hypertension, Child B cirrhosis, cardiac disease, chronic pulmonary disease, and renal failure. Patients undergoing robotic RH for donor hepatectomy were excluded. Fifteen reference values were derived from the 75th or the 25th percentile of the median values of all centers. Reference values were compared with a laparoscopic cohort from 4 centers and published benchmark values for laparoscopic and open RH. RESULTS: Of 357 patients, 172 (48%) qualified as the benchmark cohort. The main indications were hepatocellular carcinoma (31%) and colorectal liver metastases (27%). Reference values included: operative time (≤476 min), conversion rate (≤8.2%), bile leak (≤15.4%), major complications (≤23.1%), and comprehensive complication index at 90 days (≤15.6). Robotic RH compared favorably to a multinational cohort series of laparoscopic RH with lower conversion (10.0% vs ≤8.2%) and R1 rate (10.9% vs ≤0%). Compared to open robotic hepatectomy, cutoffs for major complications (≤50.0% vs ≤23.1%) and liver failure (≤22.0% vs ≤2.7%) were lower for robotic right hepatectomies. CONCLUSION: This international benchmark study on robotic right hepatectomy (RRH) demonstrates that the robotic approach provides advantages compared with laparoscopic and open RH. RRH can be expected to become the minimally invasive approach of choice for tumors in the right liver.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Published
2025-12-01
Primary Topic
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Multicenter Study From 22 Expert Centers

Mirhasan Rahimli, John B. Martinie, Philipp H. von Kroge, Janina Eden et al.
Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
article

Multicenter Study From 22 Expert Centers

Mirhasan Rahimli, John B. Martinie, Philipp H. von Kroge, Janina Eden, S Katou, Gi Hong Choi, Christian Toso, Jason Hawksworth, Asmus Heumann, Leonardo Centonze, Juba Ait Mohand, Roberta Odorizzi, Sarkis Drejian, Bjørn E. Edwin, Cristiano Guidetti, Mohammed Abu Hilal, Andreas Pascher, Beat Moeckli, Schaima Abdelhadi, Christoph Tschuor, Simon Störzer, Michael Ginesini, Rutger-Jan Swijnenburg, Roberto Ivan Troisi, Hugo Pinto Marques, Raphael L. C. Araujo, Beat P. Müller, Daisuke Fukumori, Noa L. E. Aegerter, Florian Primavesi, Mafalda Sobral, Yuta Abe, Gabriela Pilz da Cunha, Gianluca Rompianesi, Go Wakabayashi, Victor Lopez-Lopez, Benjamin Struecker, Fabrizio Di Benedetto, Tomoaki Kato, Andrea Lauterio, Philip C Müller, Ricardo Robles-Campos, Mickaël Lesurtel, Taiga Wakabayashi, Yutaka Nakano, Stefan Stättner, Roland Croner, Zhihao Li, Iswanto Sucandy, Moritz Schmelzle, Charles Chung-Wei Lin, Antonella Delvecchio, Soufyan El Adel, Ugo Boggi, Christoph Reissfelder, Adrian T Billeter, Riccardo Memeo, Philipp Dutkowski, Christoph Kuemmerli
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to identify benchmark values for robotic right hepatectomy (RH) based on a low-risk cohort treated at expert centers. BACKGROUND: Robotic liver surgery is emerging as a preferred minimally invasive approach to the liver. To enable conclusive comparisons with the standard open or laparoscopic approaches, reference values are needed. METHODS: Outcomes from consecutive patients undergoing robotic RH for malignant or benign indications at 22 international expert centers between 2018 and 2024 were analyzed. Low-risk, benchmark patients were without significant comorbidities such as portal hypertension, Child B cirrhosis, cardiac disease, chronic pulmonary disease, and renal failure. Patients undergoing robotic RH for donor hepatectomy were excluded. Fifteen reference values were derived from the 75th or the 25th percentile of the median values of all centers. Reference values were compared with a laparoscopic cohort from 4 centers and published benchmark values for laparoscopic and open RH. RESULTS: Of 357 patients, 172 (48%) qualified as the benchmark cohort. The main indications were hepatocellular carcinoma (31%) and colorectal liver metastases (27%). Reference values included: operative time (≤476 min), conversion rate (≤8.2%), bile leak (≤15.4%), major complications (≤23.1%), and comprehensive complication index at 90 days (≤15.6). Robotic RH compared favorably to a multinational cohort series of laparoscopic RH with lower conversion (10.0% vs ≤8.2%) and R1 rate (10.9% vs ≤0%). Compared to open robotic hepatectomy, cutoffs for major complications (≤50.0% vs ≤23.1%) and liver failure (≤22.0% vs ≤2.7%) were lower for robotic right hepatectomies. CONCLUSION: This international benchmark study on robotic right hepatectomy (RRH) demonstrates that the robotic approach provides advantages compared with laparoscopic and open RH. RRH can be expected to become the minimally invasive approach of choice for tumors in the right liver.

Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT)
Partnerships for the goals
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Treatment and Prognosis
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.