Abstract PS4-11-09: Axillary Management Strategies in Breast Cancer Patients With ypN0 After Neoadjuvant Therapy

Abstract Background: The optimal axillary management for breast cancer patients achieving nodal pathological complete response (ypN0) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) remains unclear, particularly regarding the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) versus axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). We aimed to compare survival outcomes associated with SLNB and ALND in ypN0 patients and evaluate the influence of clinical nodal stage and postoperative axillary radiotherapy. Methods: Using the National Cancer Database (2018-2022), we identified female patients with clinical stage I-III invasive breast cancer who received NAT and achieved ypN0. Patients were grouped based on receipt of SLNB or upfront ALND. Overlap weighting using propensity scores was applied to adjust for baseline differences. Overall survival (OS) was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Subgroup analyses were stratified by initial clinical nodal stage (cN0-cN3), and exploratory analyses evaluated the impact of axillary radiotherapy on OS. Results: Among 36,452 eligible ypN0 patients, 86.3% received SLNB and 13.7% underwent ALND. After weighting, covariate balance was achieved. SLNB was associated with improved OS compared to ALND (weighted HR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.11-1.60; p=0.03). Survival benefit from SLNB was strongest in cN0 (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.47-0.89) and cN1 (HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.52-0.87) subgroups. No significant OS difference was observed in cN2 or cN3 patients. Axillary radiotherapy did not significantly influence OS in either SLNB or ALND groups. Conclusions: In breast cancer patients achieving ypN0 after NAT, SLNB is associated with favorable survival compared to ALND, particularly in those with low baseline nodal burden (cN0-cN1). The lack of OS benefit from axillary radiotherapy suggests that de-escalation strategies may be safe and appropriate in selected patients. These findings support individualized, response-adapted axillary management after NAT. Citation Format: Q. Shang, Z. Yan, L. Sheng, W. Xin. Axillary Management Strategies in Breast Cancer Patients With ypN0 After Neoadjuvant Therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-11-09.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps4-11-09
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS4-11-09: Axillary Management Strategies in Breast Cancer Patients With ypN0 After Neoadjuvant Therapy

Qingyao Shang, W. Xin, Z. Yan, L. Sheng
Clinical Cancer Research
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Abstract PS4-11-09: Axillary Management Strategies in Breast Cancer Patients With ypN0 After Neoadjuvant Therapy

Qingyao Shang, W. Xin, Z. Yan, L. Sheng
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: The optimal axillary management for breast cancer patients achieving nodal pathological complete response (ypN0) after neoadjuvant therapy (NAT) remains unclear, particularly regarding the use of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB) versus axillary lymph node dissection (ALND). We aimed to compare survival outcomes associated with SLNB and ALND in ypN0 patients and evaluate the influence of clinical nodal stage and postoperative axillary radiotherapy. Methods: Using the National Cancer Database (2018-2022), we identified female patients with clinical stage I-III invasive breast cancer who received NAT and achieved ypN0. Patients were grouped based on receipt of SLNB or upfront ALND. Overlap weighting using propensity scores was applied to adjust for baseline differences. Overall survival (OS) was compared using Kaplan-Meier analysis and Cox proportional hazards modeling. Subgroup analyses were stratified by initial clinical nodal stage (cN0-cN3), and exploratory analyses evaluated the impact of axillary radiotherapy on OS. Results: Among 36,452 eligible ypN0 patients, 86.3% received SLNB and 13.7% underwent ALND. After weighting, covariate balance was achieved. SLNB was associated with improved OS compared to ALND (weighted HR: 1.33; 95% CI: 1.11-1.60; p=0.03). Survival benefit from SLNB was strongest in cN0 (HR: 0.65; 95% CI: 0.47-0.89) and cN1 (HR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.52-0.87) subgroups. No significant OS difference was observed in cN2 or cN3 patients. Axillary radiotherapy did not significantly influence OS in either SLNB or ALND groups. Conclusions: In breast cancer patients achieving ypN0 after NAT, SLNB is associated with favorable survival compared to ALND, particularly in those with low baseline nodal burden (cN0-cN1). The lack of OS benefit from axillary radiotherapy suggests that de-escalation strategies may be safe and appropriate in selected patients. These findings support individualized, response-adapted axillary management after NAT. Citation Format: Q. Shang, Z. Yan, L. Sheng, W. Xin. Axillary Management Strategies in Breast Cancer Patients With ypN0 After Neoadjuvant Therapy [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-11-09.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
Duke University (US), Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.