Abstract PS3-10-22: An Online Tool to Assist Decisions on Chemotherapy for Men with Luminal Early Breast Cancer

Abstract Background: Due to the rarity of male breast cancer (MBC), prognosis prediction and chemotherapy indication remain understudied. We aimed to develop a generalized model to predict outcomes and identify candidates for chemotherapy omission in luminal early-stage MBC. Methods: Luminal MBC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program (2010-2018, N=2996) and a Chinese cohort (2000-2020, N=599) were included. SEER-derived patients (2010-2016) were split into training (N=1356) and test (N=905) sets in a 6:4 ratio; others formed the US validation set (2017-2018, N=735). Chinese patients constituted the CHN validation set. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Four machine learning models and a Cox-based nomogram were evaluated. Risk stratification (low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups) was based on the tertiles of 5-year risk scores in the training set predicted by the optimal model. Survival analysis employed Kaplan-Meier, log-rank tests, and Cox regression. Results: The optimal model showed robust performance (C-indices: training set=0.715, test set=0.713, US validation set=0.742, CHN validation set=0.748). OS of three risk groups differed significantly across all datasets (all P<0.001). Chemotherapy conferred no OS benefit in low-risk patients [Univariate: training set, hazard ratio (HR)=1.87, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.24 to 2.80, P=0.002; other sets, P=0.176, P=0.147, P=0.864, respectively. Multivariate: training set, HR=1.80, 95% CI, 1.04 to 3.10, P=0.035; test set, P=0.211; US validation set, HR=3.24, 95% CI, 0.98 to 10.73, P=0.054; CHN validation set, P=0.449]. This tool has been deployed online for free access. Conclusions: Our model accurately predicts 5-year OS rates of American and Chinese male patients with luminal early breast cancer. Its risk stratification may aid in identifying low-risk patients who may be safe to omit chemotherapy. Citation Format: Y. Gao, M. Zhang, J. Nie, G. Ye, G. Sun, L. Ma, Z. Jiang, Y. Lin. An Online Tool to Assist Decisions on Chemotherapy for Men with Luminal Early Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-10-22.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-10-22
Primary Topic
Male Breast Health Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS3-10-22: An Online Tool to Assist Decisions on Chemotherapy for Men with Luminal Early Breast Cancer

G. Sun, M. Zhang, Y. Gao, Z. Jiang et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
Male Breast Health Studies
article

Abstract PS3-10-22: An Online Tool to Assist Decisions on Chemotherapy for Men with Luminal Early Breast Cancer

G. Sun, M. Zhang, Y. Gao, Z. Jiang, Y. Lin, L. Ma, J. Nie, G. Ye
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: Due to the rarity of male breast cancer (MBC), prognosis prediction and chemotherapy indication remain understudied. We aimed to develop a generalized model to predict outcomes and identify candidates for chemotherapy omission in luminal early-stage MBC. Methods: Luminal MBC patients from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program (2010-2018, N=2996) and a Chinese cohort (2000-2020, N=599) were included. SEER-derived patients (2010-2016) were split into training (N=1356) and test (N=905) sets in a 6:4 ratio; others formed the US validation set (2017-2018, N=735). Chinese patients constituted the CHN validation set. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). Four machine learning models and a Cox-based nomogram were evaluated. Risk stratification (low-, intermediate-, and high-risk groups) was based on the tertiles of 5-year risk scores in the training set predicted by the optimal model. Survival analysis employed Kaplan-Meier, log-rank tests, and Cox regression. Results: The optimal model showed robust performance (C-indices: training set=0.715, test set=0.713, US validation set=0.742, CHN validation set=0.748). OS of three risk groups differed significantly across all datasets (all P<0.001). Chemotherapy conferred no OS benefit in low-risk patients [Univariate: training set, hazard ratio (HR)=1.87, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.24 to 2.80, P=0.002; other sets, P=0.176, P=0.147, P=0.864, respectively. Multivariate: training set, HR=1.80, 95% CI, 1.04 to 3.10, P=0.035; test set, P=0.211; US validation set, HR=3.24, 95% CI, 0.98 to 10.73, P=0.054; CHN validation set, P=0.449]. This tool has been deployed online for free access. Conclusions: Our model accurately predicts 5-year OS rates of American and Chinese male patients with luminal early breast cancer. Its risk stratification may aid in identifying low-risk patients who may be safe to omit chemotherapy. Citation Format: Y. Gao, M. Zhang, J. Nie, G. Ye, G. Sun, L. Ma, Z. Jiang, Y. Lin. An Online Tool to Assist Decisions on Chemotherapy for Men with Luminal Early Breast Cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-10-22.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
Hebei Medical University (CN), Xinjiang Medical University (CN), Sun Yat-sen University (CN), Kunming Medical University (CN), Chinese PLA General Hospital (CN), Tumor Hospital of Xinjiang Medical University (CN), First People's Hospital of Foshan (CN), Fourth Hospital of Hebei Medical University (CN), The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-sen University (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 55%
Male Breast Health Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.