Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Denosumab Versus Bisphosphonates in Elderly Patients with Cancer Bone Metastases: A Target Trial Emulation Study

<b>Objective:</b> Bone-modifying agents (BMA) are central to the prevention of skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with cancer bone metastases, yet evidence guiding agent selection in very old patients remains limited. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of Denosumab versus bisphosphonates in patients aged ≥75 years with solid tumour-related bone metastases using a target trial emulation framework. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network to emulate a hypothetical randomised trial. Patients aged ≥75 years with solid tumour-related bone metastases initiating Denosumab or bisphosphonates were included. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), 10,662 patients were analysed in each treatment group. The primary outcome was time to first SRE. Secondary outcomes included individual SRE components, all-cause mortality, and safety events. <b>Results:</b> Among 21,324 matched patients (mean age, 75.6 years), bisphosphonate use was associated with a higher risk of SREs compared with Denosumab (hazard ratio [HR], 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.25). The excess risk was driven by pathological fractures (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.10-1.49), whereas other SRE components did not differ significantly. All-cause mortality was higher among bisphosphonate users (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.33-1.49, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Hypocalcaemia occurred more frequently with Denosumab (5.7% vs. 2.4%), while risks of acute kidney injury and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) were similar. Findings were consistent across sensitivity and subgroup analyses. <b>Conclusions</b>: In patients aged ≥75 years with solid tumour-related bone metastases, Denosumab was associated with lower risks of skeletal-related events-particularly pathological fractures-and reduced all-cause mortality compared with bisphosphonates. These results extend randomised trial evidence to a clinically vulnerable population and support Denosumab as a preferred BMA in older adults.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Life
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/life16020346
Primary Topic
Bone health and treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Denosumab Versus Bisphosphonates in Elderly Patients with Cancer Bone Metastases: A Target Trial Emulation Study

Chun-Liang Hsu, CHO-Hao Lee, Po-Huang Chen, Wei-Cheng Chang et al.
Life
Bone health and treatments
article

Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Denosumab Versus Bisphosphonates in Elderly Patients with Cancer Bone Metastases: A Target Trial Emulation Study

Chun-Liang Hsu, CHO-Hao Lee, Po-Huang Chen, Wei-Cheng Chang, Hsin-Yu Chen, Shao-Hsuan Chang, Shun-Neng Hsu, Che-Wei Liu
article en

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> Bone-modifying agents (BMA) are central to the prevention of skeletal-related events (SREs) in patients with cancer bone metastases, yet evidence guiding agent selection in very old patients remains limited. This study aimed to compare the effectiveness and safety of Denosumab versus bisphosphonates in patients aged ≥75 years with solid tumour-related bone metastases using a target trial emulation framework. <b>Methods:</b> We conducted a retrospective cohort study using the TriNetX Global Collaborative Network to emulate a hypothetical randomised trial. Patients aged ≥75 years with solid tumour-related bone metastases initiating Denosumab or bisphosphonates were included. After 1:1 propensity score matching (PSM), 10,662 patients were analysed in each treatment group. The primary outcome was time to first SRE. Secondary outcomes included individual SRE components, all-cause mortality, and safety events. <b>Results:</b> Among 21,324 matched patients (mean age, 75.6 years), bisphosphonate use was associated with a higher risk of SREs compared with Denosumab (hazard ratio [HR], 1.15; 95% CI, 1.06-1.25). The excess risk was driven by pathological fractures (HR, 1.28; 95% CI, 1.10-1.49), whereas other SRE components did not differ significantly. All-cause mortality was higher among bisphosphonate users (HR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.33-1.49, <i>p</i> < 0.001). Hypocalcaemia occurred more frequently with Denosumab (5.7% vs. 2.4%), while risks of acute kidney injury and end-stage renal disease (ESRD) were similar. Findings were consistent across sensitivity and subgroup analyses. <b>Conclusions</b>: In patients aged ≥75 years with solid tumour-related bone metastases, Denosumab was associated with lower risks of skeletal-related events-particularly pathological fractures-and reduced all-cause mortality compared with bisphosphonates. These results extend randomised trial evidence to a clinically vulnerable population and support Denosumab as a preferred BMA in older adults.

LifeVol. 16(2)
Fu Jen Catholic University (TW), Chang Gung University (TW), National Tsing Hua University (TW), Eye Center (SA), Cathay General Hospital (TW), Chi Mei Medical Center (TW), National Defense Medical Center (TW)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 50%
Bone health and treatments
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.