Abstract PS3-09-20: Not all pN1 ER-pos HER2-neg breast cancers are equal: why careful patient selection is key for adjuvant ribociclib

Abstract Introduction: For patients with high-risk ER-pos, HER2-neg breast cancer, adding abemaciclib (2 years) or ribociclib (3 years) to standard endocrine therapy improves invasive disease-free survival (IDFS). We hypothesize that not all patients who meet the eligibility criteria of the NATALEE trial will derive a clinically meaningful benefit from 3 years of adjuvant ribociclib. Previously, we demonstrated that patients with grade 3 pT2N0 tumors have a high risk of recurrence and might benefit from this additional treatment. Contrarily, patients with a pT0-2N1 tumor with more favorable tumor biology (grade 1-2), might have a low risk of recurrence irrespective of adjuvant treatment with a CDK4/6 inhibitor. The RxPONDER trial showed that 2497 patients with pN1, genomically low-risk tumors achieved a 94% 5-year distant disease-free survival (DDFS) with endocrine therapy alone. Here, we present real-world outcomes for patients with grade 1-2, pT0-2N1, ER-pos, HER2-neg tumors. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the UZ Leuven-database of patients with early-stage ER-pos, HER2-neg breast cancer who underwent surgery between 2000 and 2023. All patients included met the NATALEE trial eligibility criteria for adjuvant ribociclib following local therapy. Eligibility (Cohort 1) was defined as stage III disease (AJCC 8th edition) or stage II including either pN1 or pT2-3N0 tumors with grade 3, or grade 2 tumors with Ki-67 >20% and/or a MammaPrint high-risk profile. We assessed both IDFS and DDFS in this NATALEE-eligible population and compared (Cohort 1) to a predefined lower-risk subgroup (Cohort 2), characterized as patients with stage II, pT0-2N1, grade 1 or 2 tumors (excluding pT1N1mi). Kaplan-Meier curves were used for the estimation of the DDFS and IDFS for both cohorts. Analyses have been performed using SPSS software. The 4-year outcome was chosen in accordance with the ESMO 2024 updated analysis of NATALEE with a 44.2 median follow-up. Results: We identified 3980 patients eligible for adjuvant ribociclib according to NATALEE-criteria (Cohort 1); 66,8% were stage II and 1357 of them met the lower-risk subgroup criteria (Cohort 2). Median age at diagnosis was 58 years for both cohorts and median follow-up time was 17,6 years for Cohort 1 and 18,8 years for Cohort 2. Analysis showed a 4-year IDFS for Cohort 1 of 87,6% as compared to 93,5% for patients for Cohort 2. DDFS was 86.4 % and 94.5% respectively. At 10 years of follow-up the absolute difference in DDFS increased to 9,9% (70,1% vs. 80,0%). Discussion: We found that lower-risk, NATALEE eligible patients, already have an encouraging 4-year IDFS and DDFS. These data emphasize the need for careful patient selection, to derive a clinically meaningful benefit, balancing efficacy against potential toxicity. Citation Format: B. Salaets, A. Deblander, L. De Sutter, K. Van Baelen, M. Van Houdt, N. Willers, T. Baert, A. Baten, F. Derouane, G. Floris, S. Han, H. Janssen, I. Nevelsteen, C. Remmerie, A. Smeets, J. Verhoeven, Y. Van Herck, C. Van Ongeval, C. Weltens, H. Wildiers, P. Neven. Not all pN1 ER-pos HER2-neg breast cancers are equal: why careful patient selection is key for adjuvant ribociclib [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-09-20.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps3-09-20
Primary Topic
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS3-09-20: Not all pN1 ER-pos HER2-neg breast cancers are equal: why careful patient selection is key for adjuvant ribociclib

Nynke Willers, Ines Nevelsteen, Maxime Van Houdt, Karen Van Baelen et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
article

Abstract PS3-09-20: Not all pN1 ER-pos HER2-neg breast cancers are equal: why careful patient selection is key for adjuvant ribociclib

Nynke Willers, Ines Nevelsteen, Maxime Van Houdt, Karen Van Baelen, Chantal Remmerie, Anne Deblander, Adinda Baten, Hans Janßen, Jan W. Verhoeven, L. De Sutter, S. Han, C. Weltens, B. Salaets, T. Baert, P. Neven, A. Smeets, F. Derouane, C. Van Ongeval, H. Wildiers, Y. Van Herck
article en

Abstract

Abstract Introduction: For patients with high-risk ER-pos, HER2-neg breast cancer, adding abemaciclib (2 years) or ribociclib (3 years) to standard endocrine therapy improves invasive disease-free survival (IDFS). We hypothesize that not all patients who meet the eligibility criteria of the NATALEE trial will derive a clinically meaningful benefit from 3 years of adjuvant ribociclib. Previously, we demonstrated that patients with grade 3 pT2N0 tumors have a high risk of recurrence and might benefit from this additional treatment. Contrarily, patients with a pT0-2N1 tumor with more favorable tumor biology (grade 1-2), might have a low risk of recurrence irrespective of adjuvant treatment with a CDK4/6 inhibitor. The RxPONDER trial showed that 2497 patients with pN1, genomically low-risk tumors achieved a 94% 5-year distant disease-free survival (DDFS) with endocrine therapy alone. Here, we present real-world outcomes for patients with grade 1-2, pT0-2N1, ER-pos, HER2-neg tumors. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the UZ Leuven-database of patients with early-stage ER-pos, HER2-neg breast cancer who underwent surgery between 2000 and 2023. All patients included met the NATALEE trial eligibility criteria for adjuvant ribociclib following local therapy. Eligibility (Cohort 1) was defined as stage III disease (AJCC 8th edition) or stage II including either pN1 or pT2-3N0 tumors with grade 3, or grade 2 tumors with Ki-67 >20% and/or a MammaPrint high-risk profile. We assessed both IDFS and DDFS in this NATALEE-eligible population and compared (Cohort 1) to a predefined lower-risk subgroup (Cohort 2), characterized as patients with stage II, pT0-2N1, grade 1 or 2 tumors (excluding pT1N1mi). Kaplan-Meier curves were used for the estimation of the DDFS and IDFS for both cohorts. Analyses have been performed using SPSS software. The 4-year outcome was chosen in accordance with the ESMO 2024 updated analysis of NATALEE with a 44.2 median follow-up. Results: We identified 3980 patients eligible for adjuvant ribociclib according to NATALEE-criteria (Cohort 1); 66,8% were stage II and 1357 of them met the lower-risk subgroup criteria (Cohort 2). Median age at diagnosis was 58 years for both cohorts and median follow-up time was 17,6 years for Cohort 1 and 18,8 years for Cohort 2. Analysis showed a 4-year IDFS for Cohort 1 of 87,6% as compared to 93,5% for patients for Cohort 2. DDFS was 86.4 % and 94.5% respectively. At 10 years of follow-up the absolute difference in DDFS increased to 9,9% (70,1% vs. 80,0%). Discussion: We found that lower-risk, NATALEE eligible patients, already have an encouraging 4-year IDFS and DDFS. These data emphasize the need for careful patient selection, to derive a clinically meaningful benefit, balancing efficacy against potential toxicity. Citation Format: B. Salaets, A. Deblander, L. De Sutter, K. Van Baelen, M. Van Houdt, N. Willers, T. Baert, A. Baten, F. Derouane, G. Floris, S. Han, H. Janssen, I. Nevelsteen, C. Remmerie, A. Smeets, J. Verhoeven, Y. Van Herck, C. Van Ongeval, C. Weltens, H. Wildiers, P. Neven. Not all pN1 ER-pos HER2-neg breast cancers are equal: why careful patient selection is key for adjuvant ribociclib [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS3-09-20.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
The European Academy of Gynaecological Surgery (BE), KU Leuven (BE)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Advanced Breast Cancer Therapies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.