Failure in Motion: A Framework for Capability Erosion and Institutional Dysfunction

ABSTRACT Drawing on the literature on capability erosion and institutional dysfunction (ID), this study develops a conceptual framework that sheds new light on how the interaction between capability erosion and ID creates conditions for business failure across borders. By articulating two dimensions of heterogeneous capability and resource erosion (i.e., sudden and incremental) and two types of ID (i.e., formal and informal), the paper clarifies the nature of, and mechanisms through which, organizations become increasingly susceptible to the risks of obsolescence and resource erosion that culminate in business failure. The analysis explicates the dynamic and intricate interplay between capability erosion and the institutional difference hypothesis, highlighting the role of time and the pace at which failure manifests. The resulting multidimensional typology advances a more practice‐oriented scholarly discourse on business failure worldwide.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Strategic Change
Published
2026-02-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jsc.70056
Primary Topic
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Failure in Motion: A Framework for Capability Erosion and Institutional Dysfunction

Ahmed Tantawy, Joseph Amankwah‐Amoah
Strategic Change
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
article

Failure in Motion: A Framework for Capability Erosion and Institutional Dysfunction

Ahmed Tantawy, Joseph Amankwah‐Amoah
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Drawing on the literature on capability erosion and institutional dysfunction (ID), this study develops a conceptual framework that sheds new light on how the interaction between capability erosion and ID creates conditions for business failure across borders. By articulating two dimensions of heterogeneous capability and resource erosion (i.e., sudden and incremental) and two types of ID (i.e., formal and informal), the paper clarifies the nature of, and mechanisms through which, organizations become increasingly susceptible to the risks of obsolescence and resource erosion that culminate in business failure. The analysis explicates the dynamic and intricate interplay between capability erosion and the institutional difference hypothesis, highlighting the role of time and the pace at which failure manifests. The resulting multidimensional typology advances a more practice‐oriented scholarly discourse on business failure worldwide.

Strategic Change
Durham University (GB), Sheffield Hallam University (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Supply Chain Resilience and Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Failure in Motion: A Framework for Capability Erosion and Institutional Dysfunction — Ahmed Tantawy, Joseph Amankwah‐Amoah · Strategic Change (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS