Partner corporate social responsibility and alliance governance structure: a reputation-based framework and evidence

This study explores how corporate social responsibility (CSR) of a partner in an alliance shapes the governance choice between an equity and non-equity structure. Conceptually, we propose that CSR of a partner contributes to its reputation among stakeholders and the intent to preserve this reputation serves as an external governance over its behaviors within an alliance. This reduces the concerns over exchange hazards within the collaboration and, thereby, the need for equity governance. Empirical evidence consistently supports that a partner’s CSR significantly lowers the likelihood of an equity structure for an alliance. This negative effect is strengthened when the partners have richer past collaboration experience but weakened when they come from industries with greater dissimilarity. It remains stable whether partners differ in nationality. This study extends the knowledge on determinants of alliance governance, strategic benefits of CSR, and alliance-specific contingencies to the reputational implications of CSR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Business Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2026.116085
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Partner corporate social responsibility and alliance governance structure: a reputation-based framework and evidence

Qing Dai, Lucas Liang Wang
Journal of Business Research
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Partner corporate social responsibility and alliance governance structure: a reputation-based framework and evidence

Qing Dai, Lucas Liang Wang
article en

Abstract

This study explores how corporate social responsibility (CSR) of a partner in an alliance shapes the governance choice between an equity and non-equity structure. Conceptually, we propose that CSR of a partner contributes to its reputation among stakeholders and the intent to preserve this reputation serves as an external governance over its behaviors within an alliance. This reduces the concerns over exchange hazards within the collaboration and, thereby, the need for equity governance. Empirical evidence consistently supports that a partner’s CSR significantly lowers the likelihood of an equity structure for an alliance. This negative effect is strengthened when the partners have richer past collaboration experience but weakened when they come from industries with greater dissimilarity. It remains stable whether partners differ in nationality. This study extends the knowledge on determinants of alliance governance, strategic benefits of CSR, and alliance-specific contingencies to the reputational implications of CSR.

Journal of Business ResearchVol. 208
University of New Brunswick (CA), Wenzhou-Kean University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.