Abstract PS4-11-08: Clinical characteristics and prognosis in interval detected breast cancer patients: a single institution cohort analysis

Abstract Aim: The aim of this study is to identify clinical characteristics and outcomes in a cohort of patients with interval-detected breast cancers. Methods: Interval-detected cancers were tumors that arose within a year of the last screening breast imaging that appeared normal, regardless of having a previous breast cancer diagnosis. Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined separately for primary and secondary cancers from the date of diagnosis of the interval tumor to the date of first recurrence or death. Results: We identified 43 patients who met the criteria for interval-detected breast cancer. Twelve patients had a previous diagnosis of breast cancer, 2 of whom had DCIS. Median follow-up was 24.2 mo ( 4.7-10.2.5). The median age of this cohort (second-primary interval cancer) was 49 (32-70); 10 (83.3%) were premenopausal. The mean time to the diagnosis of the new cancer was 28 months;14 mo for HER2 (+) and 38 mo for ER (+). The pathologic subtypes of invasive primaries were ER (+) in 6 and Her2 (+) in 4 (40%) patients. The interval tumor was detected in the ipsilateral breast in 8 patients, among whom 6 (75%) developed the second primary in the same localization of the primary tumor. Two of those (33%) had mastectomies as primary surgical treatment. There were 8 recurrences, among whom 5 were systemic and 4 were HER2 (+). Thirty-one patients had interval-detected primary breast cancers. The median follow up period was 25.4 mo (1-114.2). The median age was 51 (42-75) and 20 (64.5%) were premenopausal. Among them 2 were triple negative; 10 were Her2 (+); and 19 were ER (+). There were 7 recurrences; among whom 2 were systemic. In the whole cohort, 27 (62.8) patients had a family history of cancer. Among second-primary interval cancer patients, 8 of 12 patients had a family history. Among those 8 who had genetic testing, 5 had pathogenic variants (3:BRCA2; 1: PALB2;1:CHEK2)The DFS of the primary group and the secondary group were 96.8 (95% CI: 78,2-115.4) and 50.6 mo (95% CI: 35,1-98.6), respectively. There was a tendency for a worse outcome in the secondary interval cancer group (p:0.2), mostly driven by the HER2 subgroup. Conclusion: Interval cancers were associated with a high incidence of pre-menopausal status, family history or hereditary pathogenic variants. Secondary interval cancers were more likely to have HER2 (+) primary tumors, a shorter time to diagnosis of the interval cancer and a tendency to occur in the same site of the primary despite adequate local and systemic treatment. There was a tendency for a worse outcome in the secondary interval cancer group. Our data indicate closer follow-up for second primary interval cancers in HER2 (+) patients. These data should be interpreted with caution due to the retrospective nature; small sample size and should be validated in larger datasets. Citation Format: Y. Eralp, S. Bayrakceken, K. Turker Karayazi, G. Esen Icten, F. Tokat, N. Bese, T. Korkmaz, O. Sonmez, H. Kara, N. Bakir, C. Uras. Clinical characteristics and prognosis in interval detected breast cancer patients: a single institution cohort analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-11-08.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps4-11-08
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS4-11-08: Clinical characteristics and prognosis in interval detected breast cancer patients: a single institution cohort analysis

Nuran Beşe, Fatma Tokat, Özlem Sönmez, Yeşim Eralp et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Abstract PS4-11-08: Clinical characteristics and prognosis in interval detected breast cancer patients: a single institution cohort analysis

Nuran Beşe, Fatma Tokat, Özlem Sönmez, Yeşim Eralp, Hasan Volkan Kara, Noor Bakir, Serra Bayrakceken, Cihan Uras, G. Esen Icten, T. Korkmaz, K. Turker Karayazi
article en

Abstract

Abstract Aim: The aim of this study is to identify clinical characteristics and outcomes in a cohort of patients with interval-detected breast cancers. Methods: Interval-detected cancers were tumors that arose within a year of the last screening breast imaging that appeared normal, regardless of having a previous breast cancer diagnosis. Disease-free survival (DFS) was defined separately for primary and secondary cancers from the date of diagnosis of the interval tumor to the date of first recurrence or death. Results: We identified 43 patients who met the criteria for interval-detected breast cancer. Twelve patients had a previous diagnosis of breast cancer, 2 of whom had DCIS. Median follow-up was 24.2 mo ( 4.7-10.2.5). The median age of this cohort (second-primary interval cancer) was 49 (32-70); 10 (83.3%) were premenopausal. The mean time to the diagnosis of the new cancer was 28 months;14 mo for HER2 (+) and 38 mo for ER (+). The pathologic subtypes of invasive primaries were ER (+) in 6 and Her2 (+) in 4 (40%) patients. The interval tumor was detected in the ipsilateral breast in 8 patients, among whom 6 (75%) developed the second primary in the same localization of the primary tumor. Two of those (33%) had mastectomies as primary surgical treatment. There were 8 recurrences, among whom 5 were systemic and 4 were HER2 (+). Thirty-one patients had interval-detected primary breast cancers. The median follow up period was 25.4 mo (1-114.2). The median age was 51 (42-75) and 20 (64.5%) were premenopausal. Among them 2 were triple negative; 10 were Her2 (+); and 19 were ER (+). There were 7 recurrences; among whom 2 were systemic. In the whole cohort, 27 (62.8) patients had a family history of cancer. Among second-primary interval cancer patients, 8 of 12 patients had a family history. Among those 8 who had genetic testing, 5 had pathogenic variants (3:BRCA2; 1: PALB2;1:CHEK2)The DFS of the primary group and the secondary group were 96.8 (95% CI: 78,2-115.4) and 50.6 mo (95% CI: 35,1-98.6), respectively. There was a tendency for a worse outcome in the secondary interval cancer group (p:0.2), mostly driven by the HER2 subgroup. Conclusion: Interval cancers were associated with a high incidence of pre-menopausal status, family history or hereditary pathogenic variants. Secondary interval cancers were more likely to have HER2 (+) primary tumors, a shorter time to diagnosis of the interval cancer and a tendency to occur in the same site of the primary despite adequate local and systemic treatment. There was a tendency for a worse outcome in the secondary interval cancer group. Our data indicate closer follow-up for second primary interval cancers in HER2 (+) patients. These data should be interpreted with caution due to the retrospective nature; small sample size and should be validated in larger datasets. Citation Format: Y. Eralp, S. Bayrakceken, K. Turker Karayazi, G. Esen Icten, F. Tokat, N. Bese, T. Korkmaz, O. Sonmez, H. Kara, N. Bakir, C. Uras. Clinical characteristics and prognosis in interval detected breast cancer patients: a single institution cohort analysis [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS4-11-08.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
Acıbadem University (TR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.