Systematic review of soiling mitigation strategies for solar photovoltaic panels

One of the most important factors impairing the performance and dependability of solar photovoltaic (PV) systems is soiling, which can result in efficiency losses of about 6–7% in a matter of months and more than 20–30% over extended exposure; reductions of up to 34% have been reported at dust loads of about 10 g/m2. In arid, humid, and urban settings, this systematic review examines soiling mechanisms and assesses mitigation strategies, emphasizing their performance recovery and technology readiness levels (TRLs). While manual and automated water-based cleaning restores 90–95% of power output and is commercially mature (TRL 9), it is constrained by water consumption and quality issues. Natural cleaning by rainfall can remove 70–90% of loosely deposited dust (TRL 9). Large-scale arid deployments can benefit from robotic dry-cleaning systems, which are fully commercialized (TRL 9) and achieve 90–99% dust removal with little to no water use. Under laboratory conditions, electrostatic and electrodynamic dust removal methods show up to approximately 95% recovery; however, they are still in the experimental stages (TRL 3–4), with difficulties in high humidity. Vibrational and ultrasonic cleaning techniques are in the early stages of development and offer about 60–70% efficacy (TRL 2–3). Hydrophobic, hydrophilic, and photocatalytic surfaces are examples of passive anti-soiling coatings that decrease dust adhesion and produce modest efficiency gains of 5–15% (TRL 4–6), but they have problems with long-term stability and durability. The review suggests next-generation multifunctional smart coatings that combine thermochromic cooling capabilities with superhydrophobic self-cleaning behaviour, backed by rainwater-harvesting recirculation systems for water-stressed areas. Overall, the results highlight the need for region-specific, cost-optimized hybrid strategies in order to maximize PV energy yield and ensure the long-term sustainability.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Discover Sustainability
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-02820-x
Primary Topic
Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Systematic review of soiling mitigation strategies for solar photovoltaic panels

Ravishankar Sathyamurthy, Pranav Mehta, Himanshukumar Patel, Abd Elnaby Kabeel et al.
Discover Sustainability
Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
article

Systematic review of soiling mitigation strategies for solar photovoltaic panels

Ravishankar Sathyamurthy, Pranav Mehta, Himanshukumar Patel, Abd Elnaby Kabeel, Vipul Shah, A. Johnson Santhosh, Prasad Dixit
article en

Abstract

One of the most important factors impairing the performance and dependability of solar photovoltaic (PV) systems is soiling, which can result in efficiency losses of about 6–7% in a matter of months and more than 20–30% over extended exposure; reductions of up to 34% have been reported at dust loads of about 10 g/m2. In arid, humid, and urban settings, this systematic review examines soiling mechanisms and assesses mitigation strategies, emphasizing their performance recovery and technology readiness levels (TRLs). While manual and automated water-based cleaning restores 90–95% of power output and is commercially mature (TRL 9), it is constrained by water consumption and quality issues. Natural cleaning by rainfall can remove 70–90% of loosely deposited dust (TRL 9). Large-scale arid deployments can benefit from robotic dry-cleaning systems, which are fully commercialized (TRL 9) and achieve 90–99% dust removal with little to no water use. Under laboratory conditions, electrostatic and electrodynamic dust removal methods show up to approximately 95% recovery; however, they are still in the experimental stages (TRL 3–4), with difficulties in high humidity. Vibrational and ultrasonic cleaning techniques are in the early stages of development and offer about 60–70% efficacy (TRL 2–3). Hydrophobic, hydrophilic, and photocatalytic surfaces are examples of passive anti-soiling coatings that decrease dust adhesion and produce modest efficiency gains of 5–15% (TRL 4–6), but they have problems with long-term stability and durability. The review suggests next-generation multifunctional smart coatings that combine thermochromic cooling capabilities with superhydrophobic self-cleaning behaviour, backed by rainwater-harvesting recirculation systems for water-stressed areas. Overall, the results highlight the need for region-specific, cost-optimized hybrid strategies in order to maximize PV energy yield and ensure the long-term sustainability.

Discover SustainabilityVol. 7(1)
Dharmsinh Desai University (IN), King Fahd University of Petroleum and Minerals (SA), Jimma University (ET), Tanta University (EG)
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Photovoltaic System Optimization Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.