Error needs culture! <i>Exploring the relationship between error culture and openness</i>

Abstract In this article, we examine the role of errors in data-driven research and assess the extent to which a lack of a constructive error culture has been addressed across various research fields. Motivated by recurring calls in the research data management community for clearer guidance, it presents examples of how scientific communities have addressed problems related to ‘flawed research’—a term we use to describe research acts that lead to wrong and unreliable results. Furthermore, it highlights observations on how error culture in science can positively impact the research process. We demonstrate that error culture both benefits from suitable infrastructures and depends on their support to spread. This creates a reciprocal relationship between error culture, transparency and open science. Consequently, we argue that errors themselves do not hinder the progress of scientific knowledge. Instead, it is the way they are subsequently dealt with that poses a challenge. Moreover, data sharing and open science practices can be fostered by developing an error culture in each disciplinary context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Royal Society Open Science
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.242233
Primary Topic
Research Data Management Practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Error needs culture! Exploring the relationship between error culture and openness

Johannes Vosskuhl, Felicitas Heßelmann, Sandra Zänkert, John Jolliffe
Royal Society Open Science
Research Data Management Practices
article

Error needs culture! Exploring the relationship between error culture and openness

Johannes Vosskuhl, Felicitas Heßelmann, Sandra Zänkert, John Jolliffe
article en

Abstract

Abstract In this article, we examine the role of errors in data-driven research and assess the extent to which a lack of a constructive error culture has been addressed across various research fields. Motivated by recurring calls in the research data management community for clearer guidance, it presents examples of how scientific communities have addressed problems related to ‘flawed research’—a term we use to describe research acts that lead to wrong and unreliable results. Furthermore, it highlights observations on how error culture in science can positively impact the research process. We demonstrate that error culture both benefits from suitable infrastructures and depends on their support to spread. This creates a reciprocal relationship between error culture, transparency and open science. Consequently, we argue that errors themselves do not hinder the progress of scientific knowledge. Instead, it is the way they are subsequently dealt with that poses a challenge. Moreover, data sharing and open science practices can be fostered by developing an error culture in each disciplinary context.

Royal Society Open ScienceVol. 13(2)
Carl von Ossietzky Universität Oldenburg (DE), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), GESIS - Leibniz Institute for the Social Sciences (DE), German Centre for Higher Education Research and Science Studies (DE), ZB MED - Information Centre for Life Sciences (DE), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 66%
Research Data Management Practices
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Error needs culture! <i>Exploring the relationship between error culture and openness</i> — Johannes Vosskuhl, Felicitas Heßelmann, et al. · Royal Society Open Science (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS