Abstract PS2-01-22: Changes in reoperation rate after publication of guidelines defined positive margins for breast conserving surgery: Collaboration study of Japanese Breast Cancer Society

Abstract Background: In 2014, the SSO-ASTRO consensus guidelines redefined a positive margin requiring re-excision after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) as “tumor on ink.” The adoption of this standard has been reported internationally to significantly reduce the rate of surgical re-excision for positive margins. In Japan, this definition was explicitly incorporated into the 2018 Japanese Breast Cancer Society clinical practice guidelines. To clarify changes in re-excision rates before and after guideline publication in Japan, we conducted a multicenter collaborative study. Method 1: A nationwide questionnaire survey was distributed to representatives of 521 Japanese Breast Cancer Society-accredited institutions to assess current practices related to BCS, including imaging, surgical and pathological assessment, rates of positive margins, and re-excision. Method 2: Multicenter cohort study was performed using databases from seven participating institutions, examining trends in positive margin and re-excision rates among patients undergoing BCS from 2008 to 2022. Result 1: Questionnaire Survey The questionnaire survey collected responses from 262 out of 521 Japanese Breast Cancer Society-accredited institutions, representing a response rate of 55.7%. Most institutions (60%) performed between 100 and 300 breast surgeries annually, and the majority (64%) had one or two breast surgeons. A full-time pathologist was present in 89% of the institutions, and preoperative MRI was utilized in 97% of cases for disease extent assessment. Notably, the proportion of institutions reporting a positive margin rate of 0-10% increased from 47% to 63% around 2018, reflecting a shift in clinical practice following the introduction of new guidelines. However, only 18% of institutions noted a decrease in re-excision rates after a positive margin post-2018, while 77% reported no change. Despite this, the proportion of institutions with a re-excision rate of 0-10% has increased slightly from 45% to 49% since 2018, indicating that more facilities have decreased their reoperation rates. Result 2: Multicenter Cohort Survey The multicenter cohort survey analyzed data from 18,688 cases of breast-conserving surgery performed between 2008 and 2022 across seven participating institutions. Over this period, the positive margin rate showed a consistent decline, decreasing from 10.7% in 2008-2014 to 8.8% in 2015-2018, and further to 6.9% in 2019-2022. Similarly, the re-excision rate dropped from 7.6% to 6.6% and then to 4.9% across the same intervals. Multivariate analysis identified several significant predictors of re-excision: younger patient age, diagnosis of invasive lobular carcinoma, larger tumor size, and presence of lymph node metastasis. Additionally, surgeries performed before 2014 (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.34-1.88, P<0.001) and before 2018 (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.10-1.60, P=0.003) were associated with a higher likelihood of re-excision compared to those performed after 2019, underscoring the impact of guideline implementation on surgical practice. Conclusions: Our findings suggest considerable diversity in the approach to BCS margin assessment among Japanese breast surgeons. Following the publication of both international and domestic guidelines regarding positive margins, a significant reduction in re-excision rates after BCS was observed in Japan. This trend was gradual, corresponding to the 2014 and 2018 consensus statements, indicating that formal guideline publication has contributed to reducing re-excision rates after breast-conserving surgery. Citation Format: T. Sakai, M. Ishitobi, Y. Sagara, A. Yoshida, Y. Takahashi, T. Tsukioki, K. Takada, Y. Ono, Y. Kimura, T. Osako. Changes in reoperation rate after publication of guidelines defined positive margins for breast conserving surgery: Collaboration study of Japanese Breast Cancer Society [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-01-22.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Cancer Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1158/1557-3265.sabcs25-ps2-01-22
Primary Topic
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Abstract PS2-01-22: Changes in reoperation rate after publication of guidelines defined positive margins for breast conserving surgery: Collaboration study of Japanese Breast Cancer Society

Takahiro Tsukioki, Yuri Kimura, Makoto Ishitobi, Kouji Takada et al.
Clinical Cancer Research
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
article

Abstract PS2-01-22: Changes in reoperation rate after publication of guidelines defined positive margins for breast conserving surgery: Collaboration study of Japanese Breast Cancer Society

Takahiro Tsukioki, Yuri Kimura, Makoto Ishitobi, Kouji Takada, Yoshihito Ono, Y. Sagara, T. Sakai, Y. Takahashi, T. Osako, A. Yoshida
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background: In 2014, the SSO-ASTRO consensus guidelines redefined a positive margin requiring re-excision after breast-conserving surgery (BCS) as “tumor on ink.” The adoption of this standard has been reported internationally to significantly reduce the rate of surgical re-excision for positive margins. In Japan, this definition was explicitly incorporated into the 2018 Japanese Breast Cancer Society clinical practice guidelines. To clarify changes in re-excision rates before and after guideline publication in Japan, we conducted a multicenter collaborative study. Method 1: A nationwide questionnaire survey was distributed to representatives of 521 Japanese Breast Cancer Society-accredited institutions to assess current practices related to BCS, including imaging, surgical and pathological assessment, rates of positive margins, and re-excision. Method 2: Multicenter cohort study was performed using databases from seven participating institutions, examining trends in positive margin and re-excision rates among patients undergoing BCS from 2008 to 2022. Result 1: Questionnaire Survey The questionnaire survey collected responses from 262 out of 521 Japanese Breast Cancer Society-accredited institutions, representing a response rate of 55.7%. Most institutions (60%) performed between 100 and 300 breast surgeries annually, and the majority (64%) had one or two breast surgeons. A full-time pathologist was present in 89% of the institutions, and preoperative MRI was utilized in 97% of cases for disease extent assessment. Notably, the proportion of institutions reporting a positive margin rate of 0-10% increased from 47% to 63% around 2018, reflecting a shift in clinical practice following the introduction of new guidelines. However, only 18% of institutions noted a decrease in re-excision rates after a positive margin post-2018, while 77% reported no change. Despite this, the proportion of institutions with a re-excision rate of 0-10% has increased slightly from 45% to 49% since 2018, indicating that more facilities have decreased their reoperation rates. Result 2: Multicenter Cohort Survey The multicenter cohort survey analyzed data from 18,688 cases of breast-conserving surgery performed between 2008 and 2022 across seven participating institutions. Over this period, the positive margin rate showed a consistent decline, decreasing from 10.7% in 2008-2014 to 8.8% in 2015-2018, and further to 6.9% in 2019-2022. Similarly, the re-excision rate dropped from 7.6% to 6.6% and then to 4.9% across the same intervals. Multivariate analysis identified several significant predictors of re-excision: younger patient age, diagnosis of invasive lobular carcinoma, larger tumor size, and presence of lymph node metastasis. Additionally, surgeries performed before 2014 (OR 1.34, 95% CI 1.34-1.88, P<0.001) and before 2018 (OR 1.33, 95% CI 1.10-1.60, P=0.003) were associated with a higher likelihood of re-excision compared to those performed after 2019, underscoring the impact of guideline implementation on surgical practice. Conclusions: Our findings suggest considerable diversity in the approach to BCS margin assessment among Japanese breast surgeons. Following the publication of both international and domestic guidelines regarding positive margins, a significant reduction in re-excision rates after BCS was observed in Japan. This trend was gradual, corresponding to the 2014 and 2018 consensus statements, indicating that formal guideline publication has contributed to reducing re-excision rates after breast-conserving surgery. Citation Format: T. Sakai, M. Ishitobi, Y. Sagara, A. Yoshida, Y. Takahashi, T. Tsukioki, K. Takada, Y. Ono, Y. Kimura, T. Osako. Changes in reoperation rate after publication of guidelines defined positive margins for breast conserving surgery: Collaboration study of Japanese Breast Cancer Society [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium 2025; 2025 Dec 9-12; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2026;32(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PS2-01-22.

Clinical Cancer ResearchVol. 32(4_Supplement)
Kyoto University (JP), Osaka Prefectural Medical Center (JP), St. Luke's International Hospital (JP), Okayama University Hospital (JP), The Cancer Institute Hospital (JP), Kishokai Medical Corporation (JP), Japanese Foundation For Cancer Research (JP), Tokyo Metropolitan University (JP)
Openalex Percentile: Top 51%
Breast Cancer Treatment Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.