The Relationship between Corneal Biomechanics and Refractive Status

Objective This study aimed to determine the relationship between corneal biomechanical properties and refractive status. Methods The study included patients who underwent routine eye examination and were divided into 3 groups based on refractive status: hyperopia group (spherical equivalent >+0.50 diopters), myopia group (spherical equivalent <–0.50 diopters), and emmetropia group (spherical equivalent within ±0.50 diopters). Corneal biomechanical parameters (corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor) and intraocular pressure were measured via an ocular response analyzer (Reichert, Corp., Buffalo, NY). Corneal biomechanical properties were compared between the three groups. Pearson’s correlation analysis, one-way ANOVA, and multivariate analysis of covariance were used to evaluate the study data. Results Corneal hysteresis and age were significantly correlated in the hyperopia, myopia, and emmetropia groups based on Pearson’s correlation analysis ( P <0.05). Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor values were adjusted for the age variable. Mean corneal hysteresis was 11.34±0.40 mmHg, 11.35±0.34 mmHg, and 11.65±0.33 mmHg in the hyperopia, myopia, and emmetropia groups, respectively ( P =0.021, one-way ANOVA). Mean corneal resistance factor was 11.05±0.35 mmHg, 10.85±0.30 mmHg, and 11.04±0.29mmHg in the hyperopia, myopia, and emmetropia groups, respectively ( P =0.047, one-way ANOVA). Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor were significantly correlated based on Pearson’s correlation analysis ( P <0.001). Moreover, according to Pearson’s correlation analysis, there was no significant correlation between corneal hysteresis and spherical equivalent, but corneal resistance factor and spherical equivalent were significantly correlated ( P =0.502 and P =0.001, respectively). Conclusion Myopes have lower corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor than hyperopes and emmetropes. Refractive status should always be a consideration when assessing corneal biomechanical properties.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
The Open Ophthalmology Journal
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2174/0118743641438282251208115302
Primary Topic
Corneal surgery and disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Relationship between Corneal Biomechanics and Refractive Status

Ayşe Ebru Bahadir
The Open Ophthalmology Journal
Corneal surgery and disorders
article

The Relationship between Corneal Biomechanics and Refractive Status

Ayşe Ebru Bahadir
article en

Abstract

Objective This study aimed to determine the relationship between corneal biomechanical properties and refractive status. Methods The study included patients who underwent routine eye examination and were divided into 3 groups based on refractive status: hyperopia group (spherical equivalent >+0.50 diopters), myopia group (spherical equivalent <–0.50 diopters), and emmetropia group (spherical equivalent within ±0.50 diopters). Corneal biomechanical parameters (corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor) and intraocular pressure were measured via an ocular response analyzer (Reichert, Corp., Buffalo, NY). Corneal biomechanical properties were compared between the three groups. Pearson’s correlation analysis, one-way ANOVA, and multivariate analysis of covariance were used to evaluate the study data. Results Corneal hysteresis and age were significantly correlated in the hyperopia, myopia, and emmetropia groups based on Pearson’s correlation analysis ( P <0.05). Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor values were adjusted for the age variable. Mean corneal hysteresis was 11.34±0.40 mmHg, 11.35±0.34 mmHg, and 11.65±0.33 mmHg in the hyperopia, myopia, and emmetropia groups, respectively ( P =0.021, one-way ANOVA). Mean corneal resistance factor was 11.05±0.35 mmHg, 10.85±0.30 mmHg, and 11.04±0.29mmHg in the hyperopia, myopia, and emmetropia groups, respectively ( P =0.047, one-way ANOVA). Corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor were significantly correlated based on Pearson’s correlation analysis ( P <0.001). Moreover, according to Pearson’s correlation analysis, there was no significant correlation between corneal hysteresis and spherical equivalent, but corneal resistance factor and spherical equivalent were significantly correlated ( P =0.502 and P =0.001, respectively). Conclusion Myopes have lower corneal hysteresis and corneal resistance factor than hyperopes and emmetropes. Refractive status should always be a consideration when assessing corneal biomechanical properties.

The Open Ophthalmology JournalVol. 20(1)
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Corneal surgery and disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.