Fundamental social motives in men and women across 42 societies

Humans rely on a suite of fundamental social motives to navigate recurring adaptive challenges. Using data from 14 532 participants across 42 societies, we examine sex similarities and differences in the strength of these motives across adulthood and sociocultural contexts, employing generalized additive models that account for spatial autocorrelation. Across societies, women reported stronger motivation for threat avoidance, long-term pair bonding and caregiving, while men reported stronger motivation for status and mate-seeking. These sex differences were largest among individuals in committed partnerships without children but were smallest-approximately halved-among parents. Men who were fathers reported motivational profiles more oriented towards protection and caregiving, aligning more closely with women's profiles in ways suggesting a shared parental care strategy. However, fathers also reported amplified status motivation relative to mothers, suggesting a sex-differentiated strategy that may complement caregiving through resource provision. Notably, sex differences in motive strength are maintained or even amplified in societies with greater gender equality, suggesting that such contexts may facilitate fuller expression of sex-linked motivational patterns. These findings highlight how fundamental social motives reflect sex-specific calibration and vary across life phases and sociocultural conditions that shape human social behaviour.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Published
2026-02-18
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2025.1970
Primary Topic
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Fundamental social motives in men and women across 42 societies

Douglas T. Kenrick, Ahra Ko, D. Vaughn Becker, Michael E. W. Varnum
Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological Sciences
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
article

Fundamental social motives in men and women across 42 societies

Douglas T. Kenrick, Ahra Ko, D. Vaughn Becker, Michael E. W. Varnum
article en

Abstract

Humans rely on a suite of fundamental social motives to navigate recurring adaptive challenges. Using data from 14 532 participants across 42 societies, we examine sex similarities and differences in the strength of these motives across adulthood and sociocultural contexts, employing generalized additive models that account for spatial autocorrelation. Across societies, women reported stronger motivation for threat avoidance, long-term pair bonding and caregiving, while men reported stronger motivation for status and mate-seeking. These sex differences were largest among individuals in committed partnerships without children but were smallest-approximately halved-among parents. Men who were fathers reported motivational profiles more oriented towards protection and caregiving, aligning more closely with women's profiles in ways suggesting a shared parental care strategy. However, fathers also reported amplified status motivation relative to mothers, suggesting a sex-differentiated strategy that may complement caregiving through resource provision. Notably, sex differences in motive strength are maintained or even amplified in societies with greater gender equality, suggesting that such contexts may facilitate fuller expression of sex-linked motivational patterns. These findings highlight how fundamental social motives reflect sex-specific calibration and vary across life phases and sociocultural conditions that shape human social behaviour.

Proceedings of the Royal Society B Biological SciencesVol. 293(2065)
California University of Pennsylvania (US), Arizona State University (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 54%
Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.