A process evaluation of the implementation of COVID-19 vaccine deployment in Kenya

<ns3:p>Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines were introduced in Kenya in March, 2021. Effective deployment arrangements are crucial to vaccine access. This study aimed to examine the implementation experiences of the COVID-19 deployment process and their influence on access to inform future pandemic responses. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional qualitative study in two purposively selected counties in Kenya (urban and rural) using in-depth interviews with national-level officials, developmental partners, county and sub-county health managers, and front-line workers (n=26). Data were analyzed using a framework approach in line with the study’s conceptual framework on the process evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine delivery. Results The findings indicate that most deployment activities (regulation, vaccine supply chain, service delivery, and supervision) leveraged existing systems and were integrated with routine processes, increasing efficiency. A mixed approach to service delivery enhanced reach, and the electronic data management system resulted in the timely availability of vaccines and reduced vaccine expiries. However, several challenges remain to be overcome. First, the national stockouts of certain vaccine types hindered uptake due to vaccine preferences or eligibility criteria. Second, financing for some deployment activities was insufficient and was mainly done through supplies and equipment sourced from the national government or through donor support, with limited financial autonomy at county and facility levels. Despite demand-generation efforts involving community health volunteers, leaders, and outreaches, vaccine hesitancy remains a pertinent challenge. Conclusion Our findings highlight the importance of pandemic preparedness, including addressing public finance management bottlenecks, resource mobilization, and adaptable health systems that can be leveraged for vaccine deployment during a pandemic. We also emphasize the importance of multi-sectoral approaches, including capacity building for local vaccine manufacturing and utilizing electronic data systems to reduce inequities and ensure sustainable, equitable access. Furthermore, we emphasize the need for process evaluations to track program implementation and address challenges.</ns3:p>

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Wellcome Open Research
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.12688/wellcomeopenres.25120.1
Primary Topic
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A process evaluation of the implementation of COVID-19 vaccine deployment in Kenya

John Ojal, Elwyn Chondo, Daniel Mbuthia, Stacey Orangi et al.
Wellcome Open Research
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
article

A process evaluation of the implementation of COVID-19 vaccine deployment in Kenya

John Ojal, Elwyn Chondo, Daniel Mbuthia, Stacey Orangi, Edwine Barasa, Carol Ngunu
article en

Abstract

<ns3:p>Background The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines were introduced in Kenya in March, 2021. Effective deployment arrangements are crucial to vaccine access. This study aimed to examine the implementation experiences of the COVID-19 deployment process and their influence on access to inform future pandemic responses. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional qualitative study in two purposively selected counties in Kenya (urban and rural) using in-depth interviews with national-level officials, developmental partners, county and sub-county health managers, and front-line workers (n=26). Data were analyzed using a framework approach in line with the study’s conceptual framework on the process evaluation of COVID-19 vaccine delivery. Results The findings indicate that most deployment activities (regulation, vaccine supply chain, service delivery, and supervision) leveraged existing systems and were integrated with routine processes, increasing efficiency. A mixed approach to service delivery enhanced reach, and the electronic data management system resulted in the timely availability of vaccines and reduced vaccine expiries. However, several challenges remain to be overcome. First, the national stockouts of certain vaccine types hindered uptake due to vaccine preferences or eligibility criteria. Second, financing for some deployment activities was insufficient and was mainly done through supplies and equipment sourced from the national government or through donor support, with limited financial autonomy at county and facility levels. Despite demand-generation efforts involving community health volunteers, leaders, and outreaches, vaccine hesitancy remains a pertinent challenge. Conclusion Our findings highlight the importance of pandemic preparedness, including addressing public finance management bottlenecks, resource mobilization, and adaptable health systems that can be leveraged for vaccine deployment during a pandemic. We also emphasize the importance of multi-sectoral approaches, including capacity building for local vaccine manufacturing and utilizing electronic data systems to reduce inequities and ensure sustainable, equitable access. Furthermore, we emphasize the need for process evaluations to track program implementation and address challenges.</ns3:p>

Wellcome Open ResearchVol. 11
Openalex Percentile: Top 62%
Vaccine Coverage and Hesitancy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.