The Masculinists and the Birth of Bisexual Politics in Germany, 1890–1945

Abstract: This article argues that the nineteenth- and early twentieth-century German movement for gay emancipation—subsequently credited as the birthplace of the “modern homosexual”—was shaped by a debate between those who believed they were arguing on behalf of an oppressed minority, and those who believed they were arguing for recognition of the ostensible fact that all men were potentially bisexual. The German sexologist Magnus Hirschfeld believed that the best argument for gay emancipation was an argument from minority rights. He harbored skepticism that bisexuals could be effective partners in that movement in part because of his own interactions with men who preferred the theory of universal bisexuality. This article investigates those men, often called the “masculinists,” who reacted furiously to Hirschfeld’s minoritarian position and forwarded their own vision of an explicitly anti-feminist and profoundly hierarchical “bisexual politics.” Recognizing the masculinists’ vision of “bisexual politics” and the conflicts it inspired in the first half of the twentieth century suggests part of why bisexuality was difficult to incorporate into subsequent movements for gay emancipation.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of the History of Sexuality
Published
2025-08-07
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/sex.00052
Primary Topic
European history and politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Masculinists and the Birth of Bisexual Politics in Germany, 1890–1945

Lauren Stokes
Journal of the History of Sexuality
European history and politics
article

The Masculinists and the Birth of Bisexual Politics in Germany, 1890–1945

Lauren Stokes
article en

Abstract

Abstract: This article argues that the nineteenth- and early twentieth-century German movement for gay emancipation—subsequently credited as the birthplace of the “modern homosexual”—was shaped by a debate between those who believed they were arguing on behalf of an oppressed minority, and those who believed they were arguing for recognition of the ostensible fact that all men were potentially bisexual. The German sexologist Magnus Hirschfeld believed that the best argument for gay emancipation was an argument from minority rights. He harbored skepticism that bisexuals could be effective partners in that movement in part because of his own interactions with men who preferred the theory of universal bisexuality. This article investigates those men, often called the “masculinists,” who reacted furiously to Hirschfeld’s minoritarian position and forwarded their own vision of an explicitly anti-feminist and profoundly hierarchical “bisexual politics.” Recognizing the masculinists’ vision of “bisexual politics” and the conflicts it inspired in the first half of the twentieth century suggests part of why bisexuality was difficult to incorporate into subsequent movements for gay emancipation.

Journal of the History of SexualityVol. 35(1)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
European history and politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.