Distinguishing causal from tagging enhancers using single-cell multiome data

Methods that analyze single-cell RNA-seq+ATAC-seq multiome data have shown promise in linking enhancers to target genes by correlating chromatin accessibility with gene expression across cells. However, correlations among ATAC-seq peaks may induce non-causal <i>tagging</i> peak-gene links (analogous to tagging associations in GWAS); indeed, we confirm that tagging effects induced by peak co-accessibility are pervasive in peak-gene linking. We defined two scores for each ATAC-seq peak: <i>co-accessibility score</i>, the sum of squared correlations with each nearby peak; and <i>co-activity score</i>, the sum of squared correlations with each nearby gene. We compared these scores in 4 multiome data sets (spanning 86k cells and 6 immune/blood cell types) and determined that co-accessibility score and co-activity score were strongly correlated across peaks ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.57</mml:mn> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.73</mml:mn></mml:math> ); these correlations were not explained by read depth, cell subtypes, or measurement noise, but are consistent with tagging. Indeed, non-causal peak-gene correlations were strongly correlated to a peak's tagging correlation with a causal peak in CRISPRi data ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.92</mml:mn></mml:math> ). We further determined that causal peak-gene associations are concentrated in specific functional categories of peaks, by regressing co-activity scores on stratified co-accessibility scores (S-CASC): e.g. 2.91x (s.e. 0.67) enrichment for peaks closest to a gene's TSS and 1.41x (s.e. 0.11) enrichment for peaks overlapping H3K27ac marks. Co-accessibility scores were substantially driven by the number of transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) within a peak, and peak-peak correlations were substantially driven by the number of TFBS pairs within the two peaks with a shared TF. These effects were concentrated in a small number of <i>pioneer</i> TFs, which activate repressed chromatin regions. Consistent with widespread tagging, peak-gene links that we fine-mapped using SuSiE significantly outperformed marginal peak-gene links in evaluation sets derived from CRISPRi and eQTL data. We provide examples demonstrating the impact of tagging effects at specific peaks and genes implicated in GWAS of blood cell traits. Our findings underscore the importance of accounting for tagging effects when linking enhancers to target genes.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
medRxiv
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.64898/2026.02.15.26346353
Primary Topic
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Distinguishing causal from tagging enhancers using single-cell multiome data

Elizabeth Dorans, Alkes L Price
medRxiv
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
article

Distinguishing causal from tagging enhancers using single-cell multiome data

Elizabeth Dorans, Alkes L Price
article en

Abstract

Methods that analyze single-cell RNA-seq+ATAC-seq multiome data have shown promise in linking enhancers to target genes by correlating chromatin accessibility with gene expression across cells. However, correlations among ATAC-seq peaks may induce non-causal <i>tagging</i> peak-gene links (analogous to tagging associations in GWAS); indeed, we confirm that tagging effects induced by peak co-accessibility are pervasive in peak-gene linking. We defined two scores for each ATAC-seq peak: <i>co-accessibility score</i>, the sum of squared correlations with each nearby peak; and <i>co-activity score</i>, the sum of squared correlations with each nearby gene. We compared these scores in 4 multiome data sets (spanning 86k cells and 6 immune/blood cell types) and determined that co-accessibility score and co-activity score were strongly correlated across peaks ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.57</mml:mn> <mml:mo>-</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.73</mml:mn></mml:math> ); these correlations were not explained by read depth, cell subtypes, or measurement noise, but are consistent with tagging. Indeed, non-causal peak-gene correlations were strongly correlated to a peak's tagging correlation with a causal peak in CRISPRi data ( <mml:math xmlns:mml="http://www.w3.org/1998/Math/MathML"><mml:mi>r</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0.92</mml:mn></mml:math> ). We further determined that causal peak-gene associations are concentrated in specific functional categories of peaks, by regressing co-activity scores on stratified co-accessibility scores (S-CASC): e.g. 2.91x (s.e. 0.67) enrichment for peaks closest to a gene's TSS and 1.41x (s.e. 0.11) enrichment for peaks overlapping H3K27ac marks. Co-accessibility scores were substantially driven by the number of transcription factor binding sites (TFBS) within a peak, and peak-peak correlations were substantially driven by the number of TFBS pairs within the two peaks with a shared TF. These effects were concentrated in a small number of <i>pioneer</i> TFs, which activate repressed chromatin regions. Consistent with widespread tagging, peak-gene links that we fine-mapped using SuSiE significantly outperformed marginal peak-gene links in evaluation sets derived from CRISPRi and eQTL data. We provide examples demonstrating the impact of tagging effects at specific peaks and genes implicated in GWAS of blood cell traits. Our findings underscore the importance of accounting for tagging effects when linking enhancers to target genes.

medRxiv
Broad Institute (US), Harvard University (US)
National Institutes of Health
Openalex Percentile: Top 52%
Single-cell and spatial transcriptomics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.