An integration model of mental imagery and aphantasia: Conceptual framework, neuromechanistic pathways, and clinical implications

Aphantasia, the strong diminution or complete absence of mental imagery, challenges long-standing views of imagery as central to cognition. Competing accounts variously explain the phenomenon as a failure of sensory reactivation or as unconscious mental imagery. Here, we propose a new framework, the integration model of aphantasia, which argues that reactivated sensory information must undergo multi-stage integration to yield imagery experience. Against unconscious imagery accounts, we argue that the neural activations observed in aphantasics are not imagery but sensory precursors: rudimentary sensory codes that lack perceptual status. Only when sensory precursors are locally integrated do they become perceptual representations, and only when these are further integrated with interoceptive signals do they give rise to conscious imagery experience. We present the integration model as a dual-stream framework that unifies recent attention- and interoception-based accounts, situate it within existing theories of mental imagery and aphantasia, and highlight its clinical relevance. In doing so, we reframe the debate on unconscious imagery and draw attention to the role of multi-stage integration as a key mechanism underlying mental imagery and its absence across different subtypes of aphantasia.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Neuropsychologia
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2026.109401
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Face Recognition and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
29.71
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An integration model of mental imagery and aphantasia: Conceptual framework, neuromechanistic pathways, and clinical implications

Timo Lehmann Kvamme, Merlin Monzel, Christian Scholz, Juha Silvanto et al.
1 citations
Neuropsychologia
Face Recognition and Perception
29.71
article

An integration model of mental imagery and aphantasia: Conceptual framework, neuromechanistic pathways, and clinical implications

Timo Lehmann Kvamme, Merlin Monzel, Christian Scholz, Juha Silvanto, Jianghao Liu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Aphantasia, the strong diminution or complete absence of mental imagery, challenges long-standing views of imagery as central to cognition. Competing accounts variously explain the phenomenon as a failure of sensory reactivation or as unconscious mental imagery. Here, we propose a new framework, the integration model of aphantasia, which argues that reactivated sensory information must undergo multi-stage integration to yield imagery experience. Against unconscious imagery accounts, we argue that the neural activations observed in aphantasics are not imagery but sensory precursors: rudimentary sensory codes that lack perceptual status. Only when sensory precursors are locally integrated do they become perceptual representations, and only when these are further integrated with interoceptive signals do they give rise to conscious imagery experience. We present the integration model as a dual-stream framework that unifies recent attention- and interoception-based accounts, situate it within existing theories of mental imagery and aphantasia, and highlight its clinical relevance. In doing so, we reframe the debate on unconscious imagery and draw attention to the role of multi-stage integration as a key mechanism underlying mental imagery and its absence across different subtypes of aphantasia.

NeuropsychologiaVol. 225
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), University of Bonn (DE), Inserm (FR), Aarhus University (DK), University of Macau (MO), Sorbonne Université (FR), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Institut du Cerveau (FR), Ruhr University Bochum (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Face Recognition and Perception
29.71
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.