Building societal resilience against child grooming: A design thinking approach to understanding the problem and priorities

Child grooming is a pervasive yet often hidden issue, with children frequently delaying disclosure until abuse or exploitation has occurred. This study presents the first empirical phase of GroSafe, a National Challenge Fund project led by TU Dublin in partnership with the Irish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (ISPCC) and funded by Research Ireland. Aligning with the Empathise and Define stages of Design Thinking, this concept phase aimed to understand the problem space and co-design a solution grounded in stakeholder needs. Stakeholder mapping was followed by qualitative interviews with 33 professionals across law enforcement, education, social services, and advocacy. The frontline professionals were engaged for their systemic perspectives and also as informed proxies for children’s lived experiences, given their daily safeguarding roles. Thematic analysis of interview data generated 15 structured needs statements, which were subsequently prioritised by 20 of the 33 participants through a structured ranking process. Stakeholder insights revealed six key barriers to early reporting of grooming: limited awareness among children and caregivers; fear and distrust of authorities; discomfort discussing personal experiences; shame and embarrassment; cultural stigma inhibiting open discussion; and inaccessible or unclear reporting pathways. These issues contribute to persistent underreporting, leading to data gaps and delayed intervention. This phase generated a set of stakeholder-informed design priorities and a conceptual framework to guide the future development of a technology-enabled intervention. The outcome is a flexible, stakeholder-informed structure to inform subsequent design decisions. Subsequent phases have engaged young people and carers in co-design activities, helping to ensure that future developments are grounded in their needs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Children and Youth Services Review
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.childyouth.2026.108834
Primary Topic
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Building societal resilience against child grooming: A design thinking approach to understanding the problem and priorities

Fiona Jennings, Susan McKeever, Armin Shams, Matt Bowden et al.
Children and Youth Services Review
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
article

Building societal resilience against child grooming: A design thinking approach to understanding the problem and priorities

Fiona Jennings, Susan McKeever, Armin Shams, Matt Bowden, Christina Thorpe, Kamran Mir, Lin Yuan Chong, Brian Barry
article en

Abstract

Child grooming is a pervasive yet often hidden issue, with children frequently delaying disclosure until abuse or exploitation has occurred. This study presents the first empirical phase of GroSafe, a National Challenge Fund project led by TU Dublin in partnership with the Irish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Children (ISPCC) and funded by Research Ireland. Aligning with the Empathise and Define stages of Design Thinking, this concept phase aimed to understand the problem space and co-design a solution grounded in stakeholder needs. Stakeholder mapping was followed by qualitative interviews with 33 professionals across law enforcement, education, social services, and advocacy. The frontline professionals were engaged for their systemic perspectives and also as informed proxies for children’s lived experiences, given their daily safeguarding roles. Thematic analysis of interview data generated 15 structured needs statements, which were subsequently prioritised by 20 of the 33 participants through a structured ranking process. Stakeholder insights revealed six key barriers to early reporting of grooming: limited awareness among children and caregivers; fear and distrust of authorities; discomfort discussing personal experiences; shame and embarrassment; cultural stigma inhibiting open discussion; and inaccessible or unclear reporting pathways. These issues contribute to persistent underreporting, leading to data gaps and delayed intervention. This phase generated a set of stakeholder-informed design priorities and a conceptual framework to guide the future development of a technology-enabled intervention. The outcome is a flexible, stakeholder-informed structure to inform subsequent design decisions. Subsequent phases have engaged young people and carers in co-design activities, helping to ensure that future developments are grounded in their needs.

Children and Youth Services ReviewVol. 183
Trinity College Dublin (IE), Swim Ireland (IE), Technological University Dublin (IE), Irish Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals (IE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Innovative Human-Technology Interaction
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.