Analysis of Surface Guidance Versus Laser Alignment for Precision Lung Cancer Particle Therapy

IntroductionLung particle therapy using pencil beam scanning achieves high dose conformity but remains vulnerable to geometric uncertainties from suboptimal initial setup. Surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) improves setup reproducibility in photon workflows, yet evidence in lung particle therapy remains limited. This study evaluates the clinical value of SGRT in improving six degrees of freedom (6-DOF) setup reproducibility in lung cancer particle therapy.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed 63 lung cancer patients receiving 1277 treatment fractions at our center from February 2023 to January 2024. Comparisons were made between conventional laser-based positioning, which included 983 fractions, and SGRT workflows, which included 294 fractions. Following patient positioning, therapists manually registered orthogonal kilovoltage (kV) x-ray images with planning digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) to calculate 6-DOF correction parameters, including translational (lateral, longitudinal, vertical) and rotational (pitch, roll, yaw) components, and to quantify the pre-correction setup error . Absolute 6-DOF displacements and three-dimensional vector magnitudes (MAG) were measured. The analysis included 36 supine patients with 739 treatment fractions and 27 prone patients with 538 fractions.ResultsThe SGRT group exhibited statistically significant reductions in median shifts for lateral (0.25 cm to 0.21 cm, <i>p</i> = 0.021), longitudinal (0.25 cm to 0.21 cm, <i>p</i> = 0.014), pitch (1.0° to 0.8°, <i>p</i> = 0.001), and MAG (0.59 cm to 0.53 cm, <i>p</i> = 0.002) compared to conventional methods. These improvements in median values were more pronounced in supine-positioned patients, while no significant differences were observed in prone-positioned patients. Furthermore, substantial reductions were achieved in ninth decile deviations (1.09 cm to 1.03 cm), and the third quartile deviations (0.83 cm to 0.74 cm) in the overall cohort.ConclusionSGRT enhances setup precision for proton and carbon ion lung cancer radiotherapy, reduces pre-correction setup error, and provides clinical support for patient setup reproducibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
Published
2026-02-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/15330338261425319
Primary Topic
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of Surface Guidance Versus Laser Alignment for Precision Lung Cancer Particle Therapy

Xi Zhang, Jingfang Mao, Yinxiangzi Sheng, Yuze Yang
Technology in Cancer Research & Treatment
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
article

Analysis of Surface Guidance Versus Laser Alignment for Precision Lung Cancer Particle Therapy

Xi Zhang, Jingfang Mao, Yinxiangzi Sheng, Yuze Yang
article en

Abstract

IntroductionLung particle therapy using pencil beam scanning achieves high dose conformity but remains vulnerable to geometric uncertainties from suboptimal initial setup. Surface-guided radiotherapy (SGRT) improves setup reproducibility in photon workflows, yet evidence in lung particle therapy remains limited. This study evaluates the clinical value of SGRT in improving six degrees of freedom (6-DOF) setup reproducibility in lung cancer particle therapy.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed 63 lung cancer patients receiving 1277 treatment fractions at our center from February 2023 to January 2024. Comparisons were made between conventional laser-based positioning, which included 983 fractions, and SGRT workflows, which included 294 fractions. Following patient positioning, therapists manually registered orthogonal kilovoltage (kV) x-ray images with planning digitally reconstructed radiographs (DRRs) to calculate 6-DOF correction parameters, including translational (lateral, longitudinal, vertical) and rotational (pitch, roll, yaw) components, and to quantify the pre-correction setup error . Absolute 6-DOF displacements and three-dimensional vector magnitudes (MAG) were measured. The analysis included 36 supine patients with 739 treatment fractions and 27 prone patients with 538 fractions.ResultsThe SGRT group exhibited statistically significant reductions in median shifts for lateral (0.25 cm to 0.21 cm, <i>p</i> = 0.021), longitudinal (0.25 cm to 0.21 cm, <i>p</i> = 0.014), pitch (1.0° to 0.8°, <i>p</i> = 0.001), and MAG (0.59 cm to 0.53 cm, <i>p</i> = 0.002) compared to conventional methods. These improvements in median values were more pronounced in supine-positioned patients, while no significant differences were observed in prone-positioned patients. Furthermore, substantial reductions were achieved in ninth decile deviations (1.09 cm to 1.03 cm), and the third quartile deviations (0.83 cm to 0.74 cm) in the overall cohort.ConclusionSGRT enhances setup precision for proton and carbon ion lung cancer radiotherapy, reduces pre-correction setup error, and provides clinical support for patient setup reproducibility.

Technology in Cancer Research & TreatmentVol. 25
Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center (CN), Center for High Pressure Science & Technology Advanced Research (CN), Shanghai Institute of Hematology (CN)
Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 46%
Advanced Radiotherapy Techniques
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.