Ethical dilemmas in the use of artificial intelligence in transfusion medicine

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are beginning to enhance key workflows across blood banking (BB) and transfusion medicine (TM), including donor engagement, inventory forecasting, immunohaematology interpretation, haemovigilance and clinical decision support. These tools can extract signals from large, diverse datasets to improve efficiency, consistency and timeliness of care while enabling more proactive patient blood management. At the same time, TM is uniquely sensitive to safety and trust, so the field must pair innovation with disciplined validation and governance. This review surveys emerging applications and distils a balanced ethics and oversight framework tailored to TM and BB practice. Core elements include outcome-focused validation and continuous monitoring; targeted fairness testing where biological or scientific plausibility suggests subgroup differences; layered transparency that distinguishes transparency, interpretability and explainability; and privacy by design with proportionate consent. We emphasize human oversight at every step: clinicians and laboratorians evaluate, monitor and troubleshoot models, perform tasks AI cannot, integrate multiple inputs to make decisions and interact with AI through guardrails such as intended-use statements, confidence thresholds and clear override pathways. Accountability is shared across users, service directors, institutions and regulators. When implemented with these safeguards, AI can reduce preventable errors, improve resource allocation and support more equitable access to safe transfusion. The goal is principled pragmatism that protects patients and donors while enabling timely adoption of well-validated tools.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Vox Sanguinis
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/vox.70183
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Blood donation and transfusion practices
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
133.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethical dilemmas in the use of artificial intelligence in transfusion medicine

Jansen N. Seheult, Momin M. Malik, Jay R. Malone, Brian R. Jackson et al.
2 citations
Vox Sanguinis
Blood donation and transfusion practices
133.45
article

Ethical dilemmas in the use of artificial intelligence in transfusion medicine

Jansen N. Seheult, Momin M. Malik, Jay R. Malone, Brian R. Jackson, Mark Yazer
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) are beginning to enhance key workflows across blood banking (BB) and transfusion medicine (TM), including donor engagement, inventory forecasting, immunohaematology interpretation, haemovigilance and clinical decision support. These tools can extract signals from large, diverse datasets to improve efficiency, consistency and timeliness of care while enabling more proactive patient blood management. At the same time, TM is uniquely sensitive to safety and trust, so the field must pair innovation with disciplined validation and governance. This review surveys emerging applications and distils a balanced ethics and oversight framework tailored to TM and BB practice. Core elements include outcome-focused validation and continuous monitoring; targeted fairness testing where biological or scientific plausibility suggests subgroup differences; layered transparency that distinguishes transparency, interpretability and explainability; and privacy by design with proportionate consent. We emphasize human oversight at every step: clinicians and laboratorians evaluate, monitor and troubleshoot models, perform tasks AI cannot, integrate multiple inputs to make decisions and interact with AI through guardrails such as intended-use statements, confidence thresholds and clear override pathways. Accountability is shared across users, service directors, institutions and regulators. When implemented with these safeguards, AI can reduce preventable errors, improve resource allocation and support more equitable access to safe transfusion. The goal is principled pragmatism that protects patients and donors while enabling timely adoption of well-validated tools.

Vox Sanguinis
University of Maryland, Baltimore (US), Mayo Clinic (US), University of Pittsburgh (US), Washington University in St. Louis (US), Mayo Clinic in Florida (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Blood donation and transfusion practices
133.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.