Ethnography and the augmented interview

The principal contention of this paper is that an ethnographic interview based on the mutual discussion of specific images or things can produce entirely different results from the more conventional interview based solely on language. The main example that will be presented comes from the ethnographic work that Craig Ryder conducted with political influencers in Sri Lanka. This example takes us to the vanguard of what is possible, because it involved data visualisations that included the interviewee's social media activities. This example is then generalised to other cases where the presence of visual and material forms within the interview contexts radically changes the results of those interviews, sometimes producing almost the opposite insights to conventional interviews based merely on questions and answers. The paper concludes by showing how augmentation makes three significant contributions: it grounds the interview, it displaces dominant discourses and it creates a more collaborative relationship between the interviewer and the interviewee.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Material Culture
Published
2026-02-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/13591835261421135
Primary Topic
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Ethnography and the augmented interview

Craig Ryder
Journal of Material Culture
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
article

Ethnography and the augmented interview

Craig Ryder
article en

Abstract

The principal contention of this paper is that an ethnographic interview based on the mutual discussion of specific images or things can produce entirely different results from the more conventional interview based solely on language. The main example that will be presented comes from the ethnographic work that Craig Ryder conducted with political influencers in Sri Lanka. This example takes us to the vanguard of what is possible, because it involved data visualisations that included the interviewee's social media activities. This example is then generalised to other cases where the presence of visual and material forms within the interview contexts radically changes the results of those interviews, sometimes producing almost the opposite insights to conventional interviews based merely on questions and answers. The paper concludes by showing how augmentation makes three significant contributions: it grounds the interview, it displaces dominant discourses and it creates a more collaborative relationship between the interviewer and the interviewee.

Journal of Material Culture
University College London (GB), Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München (DE)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 58%
Focus Groups and Qualitative Methods
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Ethnography and the augmented interview — Craig Ryder · Journal of Material Culture (2026) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS